Apr 26, 2012; Charlotte, NC, USA New York Knicks guard Iman Shumpert (21) brings the ball down the court during the first half against the Charlotte Bobcats. The New York Knicks defeated the Charlotte Bobcats 104-84 at Time Warner Cable Arena. Mandatory Credit: Jeremy Brevard-US PRESSWIRE

The Knicks have had 22 picks since 2000 that have produced a total of one All-Star appearance. Thirteen of those picks did or have done next to nothing (or worse) in the NBA.

With the No. 48 pick in the 2012 draft (Kostas Papanikolaou), it’s easy to say that history is not on the Knicks side, but the last two times the Knicks have been on the clock, they did pretty well by selecting Landry Fields (2010) and Iman Shumpert (2011).

Now that the draft is in the books, I thought it would be intreresting to take a look back at the Knicks drafts since 2000.

Warning: Proceed with Caution. Some of these selections may make you sick.

2000: Donnell Harvey, Florida (22nd overall); Lavor Postell, St. John’s (39th)

Who could forget the 2000 draft. Actually probably everyone because it was very forgettable. Harvey was dealt (along with John Wallace) for Erick Strickland and Postell averaged 3.2 points per game in three seasons in the Big Apple. Looking back, DeShawn Stevenson was selected right after Harvey and the Knicks passed on Michael Redd to take Postell.

2001: Michael Wright, Arizona (38th); Eric Chenowith, Kansas (42nd)

The Knicks had only a pair of second rounders in 2001, but missed on both as neither played in the NBA.

2002: Nene, Brazil (7th); Milos Vujavic, Serbia (36th)

The Knicks almost got it right with Nene in 2002, but we all know how that turned out after he, Marcus Camby and Mark Jackson were traded for Antonio McDyess and Frank Williams.

Nene has averaged 15.1 points and 8.5 rebounds and all the Knicks have to show for the first three draft classes of the decade are Postell‘s 3.2 points per game.

2003: Michael Sweetney, Georgetown (9th); Maciej Lampe, Spain (30th); Slaveko Vranes, Montenegro (39th)

To say the Knicks missed badly in 2003 would be the understatement of the decade.

2004: Trevor Ariza, UCLA (44th)

Finally a guy that turned into a decent basketball player. The only problem is that he didn’t do it in New York and was a part of the Steve Francis trade. If you are scoring at home, that’s five drafts with nothing to show for it.

2005: Channing Frye, Arizona (8th); David Lee, Florida (30th); Dijon Thompson, UCLA (54th)

Mar 13, 2010; Dallas, TX, USA; New York Knicks center David Lee (42) grabs an offensive rebound against the Dallas Mavericks at American Airlines Arena. The Knicks beat the Mavs 128-94. Mandatory Credit: Matthew Emmons-US PRESSWIRE

It took five years for the Knicks to land a player that would contribute, but this wasn’t a terrible draft on paper as the Knicks got a couple of assets. 

Frye had a decent rookie season when he average 12.3 points and 5.3 rebounds, but was traded to Portland after two seasons in the Big Apple in the Zach Randolph deal.

Lee is the only Knicks draft pick to make an All-Star team this century. He spent five seasons in the Big Apple and became a very productive player, his best season coming in 2010 when he averaged 20.2 points and 11.7 rebounds.

Thompson played two unproductive seasons in the NBA, none with the Knicks as he was part of a draft day trade that sent Kurt Thomas to Phoenix for Quentin Richardson and Nate Robinson.

2006: Renaldo Balkman, South Carolina (20th); Mardy Collins, Temple (29th)

How could anyone forget this failed draft? This was Isiah Thomas at his best, especially since Rajon Rondo went with the very next pick after Balkman and Kyle Lowry was also still on the board.

Balkman played four seasons in a Knicks uniform in two different stops and never averaged more than the 4.9 points per game he did as a rookie.

Collins played 2.5 seasons in New York and never average more than the 4.5 points he did as a rookie.

With a pair of first round picks in his pocket, Thomas struck out swinging on both. This draft is one that sticks with me when you look at the Knicks recent failures.

2007:  Wilson Chandler, DePaul (23rd)

No complaints here as Chandler became one of my favorite Knicks until he was dealt in the Carmelo Anthony trade.

2008: Danilo Gallinari, Italy (6th)

Two good picks in a row and without them, the Knicks wouldn’t have Anthony right now. As painful as it was to see Gallinari and Chandler go, it was nice to see two draft picks that were NBA players. Gallinari reminded Knicks fans of how good he was when the dropped 37 on the Knicks and severely outplayed Melo in a Denver win at the Garden in January.

2009: Jordan Hill, Arizona (8th)

Well the streak of  two good first round draft picks ended in a big way when the Knicks took Hill with the eighth overall pick in 2009. The very next two picks were DeMar DeRozan and Brandon Jennings.

Hill played 24 games as a Knick and averaged 4.0 points per game before being dealt to Houston in the Tracy McGrady deal that ultimately cost the club their first round pick this season which ultimately turned out to be Royce White, who has a chance to be a very good NBA player.

2010: Andy Rautins, Syracuse (38th); Landry Fields, Stanford (39th)

Rautins did nothing, but Fields has turned into a nice player. Considering where the Knicks were picking, to come out with a player that started 143 of 148 games in the second round is a very good value pick.

Rautins on the other hand has appeared in a total of five NBA games, playing a grand total of 24 minutes.

2011: Iman Shumpert, Georgia Tech (17th)

The Knicks did well with Shumpert who as a rookie became an outstanding defensive guard. Hopefully his knee recovers fully as Shumpert is slated to be the starting 2-guard for a long time.

2012: Kostas Papanikolaou, Greece (48th)

This guy is talented and although Knicks fans would have rather hoped to hear a name called out that could contribute right away, but while Papanikolaou won’t be coming to the NBA for a couple of seasons, hopefully the Knicks can finally hit on one of these foreign-born players.

Here’s a look at how each team graded out after the 2012 NBA Draft

Atlanta Hawks 

John Jenkins at No. 23 is a bit of a stretch although I love his shooting ability. Virginia’s Mike Scott will be a very good bench player for the Hawks.

Overall, the Hawks didn’t make a big splash but they added a couple of possible contributors.

Grade:  C+

Boston Celtics 

Mar 31, 2012; New Orleans, LA, USA; Ohio State Buckeyes forward Jared Sullinger (0) walks back to the locker room after the semifinals of the 2012 NCAA men

Plenty of teams stayed away from Jared Sullinger, but he’s worth the risk at No. 21.

Fab Melo is a project, but he adds much-needed size and Kris Joseph will also provide solid depth for the team. The Celtics got bigger and younger almost overnight though which was a goal, even though Sullinger and Melo are question marks. 

Grade:  B

Brooklyn Nets

Tyshawn Taylor could be a good backup guard on this team and down the road could become a quality defender and underrated scorer.

Tornike Shengelia and Ilkan Karaman don’t do much for them now and may never see the court in the NBA.

The Nets might very well lose both Deron Williams and Gerald Wallace and, since this draft doesn’t look good on paper, they could be heading for a lottery pick next season.   

Grade:  D-

Charlotte Bobcats

The Bobcats needed players to make an impact and Michael Kidd-Gilchrist is going to be a great fit on this team. His leadership abilities and tenacity on the defensive end of the floor should be infectious on this roster.

Jeff Taylor adds another elite athlete who can defend. The Hornets are still far away, but this was a very solid draft from Michael Jordan’s team; they add two players that can not only contribute right away but who are leaders and can help change the losing culture in Charlotte.  

Grade:  B+

Chicago Bulls

Marquis Teague is a nice pick, and he is insurance for Derrick Rose. Teague would have likely been a top-10 pick next year had he stayed in school.

Teague could ultimately be better than his brother, Jeff, but I think the Bulls needed to address the 2-guard spot as adding backcourt scoring was a priority.  But the Bulls got themselves a solid player at No. 29 nonetheless.   

Grade:  B-

Cleveland Cavaliers

June 28, 2012; Newark, NJ, USA; Dion Waiters (Syracuse) puts on a cap as he is introduced as the number four overall pick to the Cleveland Cavaliers during the 2012 NBA Draft at the Prudential Center. Mandatory Credit: Jerry Lai-US PRESSWIRE

Dion Waiters at No. 4 was a surprise, but I like the pick. He doesn’t fill the need that Harrison Barnes would have, but he’s a scorer and adds toughness and the ability to get to the basket.

A Kyrie Irving-Waiters backcourt will pressure opposing defenses for years.

They gave up a lot to move up and get Tyler Zeller (three picks), but Cleveland needed some size and it was a smart move. The Cavs have a very nice young core in Irving, Waiters, Zeller and Tristan Thompson.

Looking forward, they have a nice young backcourt and some frontcourt depth. While I like the Cavs young core right now, they are still a year or two away from being a playoff team.  

Grade: B

Dallas Mavericks

Dallas added picks and more cap flexibility for the future by trading down.

Jared Cunningham, Bernard James and Jae Crowder will add nice depth, although passing on Perry Jones III and Arnett Moultrie at No. 24 could be a mistake down the road.

However, Cunningham can add scoring, and James and Crowder can add some much-needed, hard-nosed defensive play. If the Mavs sign Deron Williams they look good on paper. If not, they still need to add a couple big pieces to contend.  

Grade:  C

Denver Nuggets

Evan Fournier went too high for my liking, and it will be interesting to see if they want to bring him over this season or wait a couple of years.

Quincy Miller will turn out to be a nice pick if he develops, and Izzet Turkyilmaz could turn into something in the future, if he ever reaches the NBA.

All of these picks are for the future, though, as the Nuggets had no real pressing needs, but keep your eye on Miller as he has the ability to become a star.

Grade:  C+

Detroit Pistons

This grade could be better if Andre Drummond becomes a star, but on paper, a frontcourt that features Drummond and Greg Monroe could be very good for years to come.

I like the Pistons getting Khris Middleton and Kim English, who will add some shooting as well.

All three guys should compete for playing time right away. Add them to Brandon Knight and Monroe, and the Pistons are starting to fill out nicely.

Detroit improved with this draft, and after a strong finish to the 2012 season, the Pistons could be closer to a playoff team than most people would believe.

Grade:  B

Golden State Warriors

June 28, 2012; Newark, NJ, USA; Harrison Barnes (North Carolina), right, is introduced as the number seven overall pick to the Golden State Warriors by NBA commissioner David Stern during the 2012 NBA Draft at the Prudential Center. Mandatory Credit: Jerry Lai-US PRESSWIRE

The Warriors got a gift when Harrison Barnes fell to them, as they needed production at small forward.

He will turn out to be a steal for the Warriors, and a starting lineup of Stephen Curry, KlayThompson, Barnes, David Lee and Andrew Bogut could be very good.

Festus Ezeli is a big body that I like a lot; he should be a solid backup center for years to come. Draymond Green was a steal in the second round and Ognjen Kuzmic is a player Golden State can stash away for a few years.

This was an outstanding draft by the Warriors who add an impact player and two depth pieces. Mark Jackson’s team is a playoff team on paper.  

Grade:  A-

Houston Rockets

The Rockets added three nice players in Jeremy Lamb, Royce White and Terrence Jones, but they will regret not being able to get Drummond.

It will be interesting to see how many of the three are still with the Rockets when training camp nears, as the Rockets have a huge void in the middle.

Houston grabbed three guys that can contribute and even become starters in the NBA, plus FurkanAldemir is actually a pretty good foreign prospect who could make an impact down the road.

The Rockets are not only set up nicely for the future, but they should be pretty good in 2013 as well. They narrowly missed the playoffs in 2012, but that may not happen again next season.  

Grade:  B+

Indiana Pacers

Miles Plumlee could be decent, but he could also be out of the league quickly. Trading up to take Orlando Johnson in the second round could work out nicely but overall I did not like Indiana’s draft.

I was stumped by both of Indiana’s picks, based on what they have on the roster

The Pacers did very little to improve.

Grade:  D-

Los Angeles Clippers:

The Clippers didn’t pick in this draft.  Grade:  N/A

Los Angeles Lakers

Darius Johnson-Odom should be a good depth piece for a team in need of solid bench players and better athletes.

Robert Sacre is not a bad player to get with the final pick of the draft. Overall the Lakers added some additional size, scoring and athleticism. Not a bad night considering where they were drafting coming in.  

Grade:  C

Memphis Grizzlies

Mar 27, 2012; New York, NY, USA; Washington Huskies guard Tony Wroten (14) drives the lane during the first half half of the semifinal round against the Minnesota Golden Gophers at the NIT held at Madison Square Garden. Mandatory Credit: Anthony Gruppuso-US PRESSWIRE

I like Tony Wroten for them, but he will need time to develop, and we won’t know how this pick works out for a couple of years.

The Grizzlies needed a backup point guard so Wroten fills a need, but he is a lousy shooter anddoesn’t take care of the ball very well.

This grade could be much higher is Wroten develops the way his raw talent says he should.  

Grade: B-

Miami Heat

The Heat traded down to save cap space but there was some very good talent on the board when they picked. Jordan Hamilton could turn into a rotation guy.

Passing on Moultrie or Jones could turn into a mistake, but the Heat didn’t add or lose anything and they are the champs, so it’s not the end of the world.   

Grade D-

Milwaukee Bucks

I love the John Henson pick. Along with trading for Samuel Dalembert, Milwaukee gets deeper and better up front and should be a team that can protect the rim.

I also like Doron Lamb, who can add be a lethal shooter off the bench.

It’s been a very good couple of days for the Bucks. Milwaukee is adding the parts to possibly crack the playoffs this season.

Grade:  B+

Minnesota Timberwolves

Robbie Hummel can play defense and shoot the ball. He adds some depth for the Wolves and could be a rotation player this season.   

Grade: C

New Orleans Hornets

The Hornets added Anthony Davis with the No. 1 overall pick, which is plenty enough for the high grade. But they also added another quality player in Austin Rivers, which creates a good young combo to watch for years to come.

Darius Miller isn’t talked about as much the day after the draft, but he is a steal in the middle of Round 2. 

New Orleans isn’t a playoff team this season, but they have certainly laid down the groundwork to get there very soon. 

Grade:  A

New York Knicks  

Kostas Papanikolaou could be a star once he makes his way to the NBA.

However, it could take a couple of years, and the Knicks needed to add something in this draft that could have helped them immediately.

Grade:  B-

Oklahoma City Thunder

June 28, 2012; Newark, NJ, USA; Perry Jones III (Baylor), right, is introduced as the number twenty-eight overall pick to the Oklahoma City Thunder by NBA commissioner David Stern during the 2012 NBA Draft at the Prudential Center. Mandatory Credit: Jerry Lai-US PRESSWIRE

Getting Perry Jones III at the bottom of the first round is a steal. He’s just another young weapon for a team already loaded with them.

If Jones even comes close to living up to his potential, he will be a star.  

Grade:  A

Orlando Magic

I love Andrew Nicholson’s game and think he could be the steal of the draft. He’s a guy who can do it all and will be productive at both ends.

Kyle O’Quinn is also a nice pick and will surprise people with how productive he is.

No matter what they decide to do with Dwight Howard, the Magic have gotten bigger and added a pair of guys who can bang.  

Grade:  B+

Philadelphia 76ers

I love the upside of Maurice “Moe” Harkless, but I don’t know if Philadelphia is the best fit, since they have wing players galore right now.  I also like the upside of Arnett Moultrie, who should be a solid rebounder for the team.

The Sixers need some backcourt players, but in the future Harkless could be a star and Moultrie fills a need.

This could be that the writing is on the wall for Andre Iguodala, though. 

Grade:  C+

Phoenix Suns

This was a need pick for the Suns, but I don’t think Kendall Marshall’s game will translate well to the NBA.

Marshall is an outstanding floor general, but he’s not a great athlete and will struggle scoring and defending. Sometimes great college point guards don’t make great NBA point guards.

He will have big shoes to fill if Steve Nash leaves as a free agent; his addition alone won’t make the Suns a playoff team.  

Grade:  B-

Portland Trail Blazers

June 28, 2012; Newark, NJ, USA; Damian Lillard (Weber State), right, is introduced as the number six overall pick to the Portland Trail Blazers by NBA commissioner David Stern during the 2012 NBA Draft at the Prudential Center. Mandatory Credit: Jerry Lai-US PRESSWIRE

The Blazers had some needs and filled them.

Damian Lillard has the chance to be outstanding. Meyers Leonard has potential and a huge upside, and while it will take him some time for him to develop, Leonard has the chance to be very good.

To get a first-round talent like Will Barton in the second round is a steal. The Blazers have the pieces set in place for the future.

Leonard won’t be a difference-maker right away, and the Blazers will be too young to make a run at the playoffs, but I still love their draft.  

Grade:  A-

Sacramento Kings

Robinson fell into their lap and will be a great fit on a Kings team that has some good young talent. He is explosive and will be a tenacious rebounder.

Paired with DeMarcus Cousins, the Kings filled a huge need in the draft and could have a dominant frontcourt for years to come.

Sacramento will eventually get there, but this team is very young and must learn how to win.

To do that, the Kings must get better defensively; a season ago they allowed an NBA-worst 104.4 points per game.

That is something that doesn’t get fixed overnight. 

Grade:  A-

San Antonio Spurs

The Spurs always find players late in the draft, and Marcus Denmon could be a solid backup point guard.

He’s undersized but can shoot the ball.  

Grade:  C+

Toronto Raptors

June 28, 2012; Newark, NJ, USA; Terrence Ross (Washington) heads to the stage after being introduced as the number eight overall pick to the Toronto Raptors during the 2012 NBA Draft at the Prudential Center. Mandatory Credit: Jerry Lai-US PRESSWIRE

I like Terrence Ross a lot but the Raptors could have probably traded down and still got him. Still, he’s a player that can do it all and helps the Raptors add some toughness in the backcourt.

Second round pick, Quincy Acy adds some size and length and has the chance to be a surprise.

Tomislav Zubcic is another player to stash away who may never see the NBA. 

Grade:  C

Utah Jazz

Kevin Murphy has the chance to be a surprise. He can score the ball and at 6’6” has good size for a 2-guard.

He was worth rolling the dice on in the second round.   

Grade:  C

Washington Wizards

Bradley Beal certainly fills the hole at shooting guard, and Tomas Satoransky should provide good depth in the future.

The Wizards now have one of the most athletic backcourts in the NBA and improved both before and during the draft.

Washington will be much improved but still has a little ways to go before contending in the Eastern Conference.  

Grade:  A-

Nobody expected to snag a future All-Star with that pick. There weren’t flashy names flying around the Knicks rumor mill. There wasn’t even much hope that the Knicks could trade up for anybody or acquire a second draft pick, much like they did last year.

The names that flew around our collective minds were the likes of Kim English, Scott Machado, Darius Johnson-Odom, William Buford, Quincy Acy.

Once the draft started, and names began flying off the board, the picture appeared to become clearer for the Knicks. The first round went without a flurry of trades, and no presence from the Knicks, besides their name appearing next to a Houston Rockets pick (from New York).

Into the second round, names began to fall that many didn’t anticipate. Even then, Acy came off the board at 39. English soon followed at 44. But, two names a lot of Knicks fans had eye-balled, Johnson-Odom and Machado, continued to fall. When both names were passed over at #47, there seemed to be some rejoicing for the New York fans. “We’re going to get one of the two we really wanted! How did this happen?!”

And then, something completely different transpired. The names we expected to hear from Adam Silver wasn’t the name that was read.

Kostas Papanikolaou, Greece.

Wait, what? Who? Why? Really? No…

That was the initial reaction. Look, I get it. The Knicks didn’t see any immediate rotational pieces with that selection. The took a player they can stash in Europe for two years before even entertaining the idea of bringing him to the states. It could turn out to be a fantastic selection by the Knicks, as Papanikolaou could develop into a lottery pick-potential type player by the time he’s NBA ready.

However, we’re also surrounded by the names of past European failures by the Knicks, names like Fred Weis and Macej Lampe. We’ve been down this road before. It is uncomfortable, bumpy and winding. You’re also asking for patience from Knicks fans, an often fleeting trait we all lack.

The good news, Machado, somehow, went undrafted. If the Knicks really saw any value in him at all, there is plenty of time to bring him into training camp and compete for a roster spot.

But, still. Its hard to feel disappointed when your favorite team only owns one draft pick, and it comes after 47 players had been picked.

Yet, if its so hard to feel disappointed in that scenario, why do I feel the way I do?

After Anthony Davis goes to New Orleans with the No. 1 pick, almost anything can happen as there are anywhere between six and 10 teams talking trade right now. If any deals go down in the early hours on Thursday, I will continue to update how it effects each and every team in the first round.

With that being said, let’s dive right into it as the New Orleans Hornets are now on the clock.

Apr 2, 2012; New Orleans, LA, USA; Kentucky Wildcats forward Anthony Davis waves to the crowd after cutting down a piece of the net after the finals of the 2012 NCAA men

1. New Orleans Hornets: Anthony Davis, Kentucky

New Orleans lands the player who can make the biggest immediate impact in Davis. With his defensive ability, Davis is projected as a future All-Star and Defensive Player of the Year.

He’s a guard in a 6’11″ power forward’s body, and while he needs to add muscle, Davis will be very good at both ends of the floor.

2. Charlotte Bobcats: Thomas Robinson, Kansas 

Robinson is NBA-ready after a season in which he averaged 17.7 points per game and was second in the nation with 463 rebounds (11.9 per game).

Charlotte could trade this pick, but if they stay here, the Bobcats need to go with the guy who can help on the glass as well as score.

3. Washington Wizards: Bradley Beal, Florida            

With the trade that brought them Trevor Ariza and Emeka Okafor, the Wizards likely don’t need to draft Michael Kidd-Gilchrist, as they just added a pair of solid defensive players.

They now have a hole at the 2 and are in need of a lights-out shooter. Beal fits that bill, and a John Wall-Beal backcourt looks nice for the future.

Don’t be surprised if someone moves up to No. 2, though, to take Beal away from Washington, which could in turn cause them to field offers for this pick.

4. Cleveland Cavaliers: Harrison Barnes, North Carolina

Ideally, the Cavs would probably like to move up to No. 2 to select Beal, but if they don’t, then the choice is between Barnes and Kentucky’s Michael Kidd-Gilchrist.

Both would be a great fit, but the Cavs need a go-to scorer to pair with Rookie of the Year Kyrie Irving, and Barnes could one day be a 20-point-per-game scorer in the NBA.

5. Sacramento Kings: Michael Kidd-Gilchrist, Kentucky

MKG is a gift here for the Kings should they keep the pick.

Sacramento has a ton of guys who like to shoot the ball, but Kidd-Gilchrist can impact the game without ever needing to touch it. His tenacity on defense will earn him immediate minutes and help fix a Kings defense that allowed an NBA-worst 104.4 points per game.

He’s also a high-character player who will add toughness and a winning attitude to the locker room, something else Sacramento needs badly.

6. Portland Trail Blazers (via New Jersey Nets): Damian Lillard, Weber State

Mar 7, 2012; Missoula, MT, USA; Weber State Wildcats guard Damian Lillard (1) attempts a free throw against the Montana Grizzlies during the first half of the finals of the 2012 Big Sky Tournament at Adams Center. Mandatory Credit: James Snook-US PRESSWIRE

The Blazers need a point guard and a big man, and while Andre Drummond is an option, I love Lillard here for them.

He adds the dynamic backcourt scorer (24.5 PPG) that the Blazers need and brings a sense of toughness to the team. Lillard is a steady, athletic guard who can shoot the lights out and get to the rim.

Portland can take its chances on landing a big man later on.

7. Golden State Warriors: Andre Drummond, Connecticut

The Warriors could attempt to deal this pick for an established small forward, but if they don’t, it will be hard to pass on Drummond here.

They need a productive small forward, but with the top ones off the board, Drummond could be the young, productive big man they have needed for years.

It’s a roll of the dice, but it’s difficult to pass on someone with Drummond’s physical package and enormous upside.

8. Toronto Raptors: Dion Waiters, Syracuse

Toronto is another team that could trade out of this spot, but with Waiters’ stock rising in the fashion that it is, it’s hard to see him sliding past this spot.

He adds the ability to get to the rim from the guard position, which is something the Raptors need badly, as there is nothing but jump shooters on their roster right now.

Waiters is tough and adds scoring and projects to be a very good NBA combo guard.

9. Detroit Pistons: John Henson, North Carolina

The ACC Defensive Player of the Year is a good fit for a team looking for frontcourt help.

Henson can rebound (10.1 RPG) and block shots (2.9 BPG), which are qualities the Pistons need in a frontcourt guy to pair with Greg Monroe.

He also will make Detroit much more athletic, which is a must with this pick.

10. New Orleans Hornets (via Minnesota Timberwolves): Austin Rivers, Duke

The Hornets can go multiple ways with this pick. They need help at the point, the wing and in the middle, and while Rivers solves none of those problems, he provides them with insurance in case restricted free agent Eric Gordon leaves.

Rivers is an intriguing prospect who many teams like and can add another scorer, long-range shooting and potential star power, all things the Hornets need badly.

Adding Davis and Rivers will make this a very good draft for New Orleans.

11. Portland Trail Blazers: Meyers Leonard, Illinois

Mar 8, 2012; Indianapolis, IN, USA; Illinois Fighting Illini center Meyers Leonard (12) dunks against the Iowa Hawkeyes during the first half of the first round of 2012 Big Ten Tournament at Bankers Life Fieldhouse. Mandatory Credit: Brian Spurlock-US PRESSWIRE

Portland lucks out and gets not only the point guard it needs, but a future big man as well.

Leonard led the Big Ten in blocked shots (1.9), and even though he is a raw talent, the NBA is always enamored with size. He had an outstanding combine, and his stock is way up. He could fill the need in the middle for the Blazers.

Leonard won’t be a star right away, but he has a ton of overall talent. With Leonard, Portland gets size, athletic ability and a ton of upside.

12. Houston Rockets (via Milwaukee Bucks): Tyler Zeller, North Carolina    

I highly doubt this is Houston’s pick come draft day, but for now, the ACC Player of the Year can add the size and athleticism in the middle that the Rockets need. Zeller averaged 16.3 points per game and 9.6 rebounds per game for North Carolina during his senior season and while he won’t likely approach those numbers, he can be productive in the NBA.

He isn’t flashy and won’t be an All-Star, but Zeller is good fundamentally and could be a solid NBA player for a decade or more.

Houston needs a center, and Zeller could become a pretty good one.

13. Phoenix Suns: Terrence Ross, Washington

Ross can score from the inside or outside, averaging 16.4 points while shooting 37 percent from behind the arc. In addition, he can defend, handles the ball well and is one of the best rebounding guards in the draft, pulling down 6.4 boards per night.

He has great size for a 2-guard at 6’6” and can do anything on the floor very well. The Suns need backcourt depth, and they get a real good player here.

The Suns need backcourt production, especially if Steve Nash leaves, and the long-range shooting ability of Ross combined with his elite athleticism will be a nice fit in the Phoenix backcourt for a long time.

14. Milwaukee Bucks (via Houston Rockets): Perry Jones III, Baylor

The Bucks moved down two spots and added Samuel Dalembert in the process so I expect them to add some production from the wing with this pick.

I love taking a chance on the potential of Jones this late. He has simply too much raw talent to slide any further. He runs like a deer and can jump through the gym, but the dominant production hasn’t come out consistently like his skill set would suggest it should.

On talent alone Jones is a top three pick.  If he ever lives up to that talent, he will be an NBA star.

He’s super athletic, but there are questions about his motor. Eventually, the rewards will outweigh the risks, and Jones has too much talent to not roll the dice on this late.

15. Philadelphia 76ers: Jeremy Lamb, Connecticut

Lamb is young but has a ton of upside and could be a steal at No. 15 for the Sixers.

They need a go-to guy, and Lamb could be exactly that, as he averaged 17.7 points per game while at UConn. If the Sixers trade Andre Iguodala and move Evan Turner to the 3, then Lamb becomes an even better fit.

He can extend his game beyond the arc—shooting 33.6 percent from three-point range—but has a devastating mid-range game. In addition, his 7’0″ wingspan should make him tough defensively, which Doug Collins will like.

16. Houston Rockets (via New York Knicks): Arnett Moultrie, Mississippi State

Moultrie has a high motor, and he produces (16.4 PPG, 10.5 RPG).

He’s big and strong enough to play either the 4 or the 5, but he has the athleticism of a guard. He’s a tenacious rebounder but can also stretch the defense, as he can score effectively inside or outside, shooting 55 percent from the floor and 44 percent from behind the arc on the season.

If Houston keeps these picks somehow, they stand to get much more athletic almost overnight.

17. Dallas Mavericks: Kendall Marshall, North Carolina   

Mar 18, 2012; Greensboro, NC, USA; North Carolina Tar Heels guard Kendall Marshall (5) reacts during the first half in the third round of the 2012 NCAA men

Marshall is the best pure floor general in the draft and makes passing the rock look much easier than it really is, setting the ACC single-season assist mark (351).

He’s an outstanding decision-maker, averaging 9.8 assists per game and posting a 3.48 assist-to-turnover ratio.

Down the road, he could bring some of the things to the Mavericks that Jason Kidd did. He makes everyone around him better and not a lot of players can say that. Even if Dallas feels they can sign Deron Williams, I still find it very hard for them to pass on a pure floor general such as Marshall.

18. Houston Rockets (via Utah Jazz through Minnesota Timberwolves): Moe Harkless, St. John’s

Houston just acquired this pick from Minnesota, and while I highly doubt it will be drafting here by draft night, if it does, then it can’t hurt to take the best available player.

The Rockets get frontcourt help with Jones and Moultrie and can continue to get more athletic with Harkless.

Even though they need backcourt depth, Harkless has the potential and upside to be a star. I love any team getting him this late.

19. Orlando Magic: Jared Sullinger, Ohio State

The Magic, depending on what happens with Dwight Howard in the next couple of days, could use a real low-post scorer. Sullinger is the top talent left on the board and a player who could come in and contribute immediately, despite the medical red flags.

His lack of athleticism is a concern, but here’s another case where the rewards could outweigh the risks. I like his post game, and he could be a decent NBA power forward.

20. Denver Nuggets: Terrence Jones, Kentucky

Jones is a guy that can add depth to the already deep Nuggets.

He can play either forward spot and can score at all three levels, shooting 50 percent from the floor and 33 percent from behind the arc.

In addition, Jones is a great athlete, so George Karl’s up-tempo attack won’t be a problem. He also averaged 1.8 blocked shots and 1.3 steals for Kentucky, so his defensive ability could earn him immediate playing time.

21. Boston Celtics: Andrew Nicholson, St. Bonaventure

I still love Nicholson here for the Celtics, but he’s also a guy that I can see rising up the board before draft day. Nicholson has the ability to stretch the floor, averaging 18.5 points per game, shooting 57 percent from the floor and 43 percent from behind the arc. 

There’s not much on the floor that he doesn’t do well and could contribute immediately for Boston, who needs some size badly, especially if Kevin Garnett doesn’t return.

22. Boston Celtics (via Los Angeles Clippers): Royce White, Iowa State    

Mar 8, 2012; Kansas City, MO, USA; Iowa State Cyclones forward Royce White (30) looks down court against Texas Longhorns during the second half of the quarterfinal round of the Big 12 Tournament at the Sprint Center. Texas defeated Iowa State 71-65. Mandatory Credit: Peter G. Aiken-US PRESSWIRE

White is another guy that I think can come in and be a surprise from day one. He has lottery talent, but his anxiety disorder and a fear of flying could make him drop.

He can score (13.4 PPG) and rebound (9.3 RPG), but while he stands 6’9”, White sees the floor like a guard. His 5.0 assists per game led the Iowa State team and actually ranked him fifth in the Big 12 Conference.

Down the road, White could be the eventual replacement for Paul Pierce. With Nicholson and White, the Celtics get younger and more talented almost overnight.

23. Atlanta Hawks: Quincy Miller, Baylor  

Atlanta will have to be patient with Miller, as he’s not NBA-ready right now.

But there’s no debating that his raw ability and huge upside are worth the risk this late. Down the road, Miller could have the ability to be a top scoring option for the Hawks.

A couple years from now he could look like a steal at No. 23.

24. Cleveland Cavaliers (via Los Angeles Lakers): Fab Melo, Syracuse

Melo measured 7’0”, and while he’s raw offensively, he can contribute immediately as a shot-blocker (2.9 BPG) and has the size to be a good rebounder.

But he has nothing that resembles a post game and has a very low basketball IQ. He won’t score with his back to the basket, instead getting a few dunks and put-backs.

With the Cavs in need of size, he’s worth a roll of the dice this late.

Melo has potential, but he has a long way to go before he makes himself a quality NBA big man. But NBA general managers love size, and Melo has that.

25. Memphis Grizzlies: Tony Wroten, Washington

Memphis will have to take its time with Wroten, as he’s another guy who isn’t NBA-ready but has a ton of raw talent.

The Grizzlies can afford to watch him develop, and down the road, he can become one of the better guards in this draft class. First, though, he must find a jumper and learn to value the basketball.

It doesn’t help that he developed a reputation for being a bad teammate, which is something else he must shake.

26. Indiana Pacers: Marquis Teague, Kentucky

Had he stayed in school, Teague would likely be a top-10 pick next season, so the talent is there. But while he has a high basketball IQ, his offensive game needs to be refined.

Teague will need time to develop, but he was impressive in March, as he really came on strong in helping lead Kentucky to the national championship. 

The Pacers could look at Teague as their point guard of the future here, and that ultimately could lead to them shopping Darren Collison.

27. Miami Heat: Jeff Taylor, Vanderbilt

Dec 29, 2011; Milwaukee, WI, USA; Vanderbilt Commodores forward Jeffery Taylor (44) during the game against the Marquette Golden Eagles at the Bradley Center. Vanderbilt defeated Marquette 74-57. Mandatory Credit: Jeff Hanisch-US PRESSWIRE

Taylor is an outstanding perimeter defender and has range on his jumper, knocking down 42 percent of his attempts from behind the arc.

In addition to being one of the better defenders in the draft, Taylor gives the NBA champs another elite athlete.

There could be minutes available as a rookie, depending on what happens with Mike Miller and his bad back.

28. Oklahoma City Thunder: Draymond Green, Michigan State   

Green does a little bit of everything and does it all very well. He makes his teammates better and will be a good asset coming off the bench in Oklahoma City, who is just really drafting for depth here.

He’s a smart and tough player who can come in and fill a need immediately for the Thunder and can be productive off the OKC bench. My only question is, who will Green guard in the NBA?

He’s way too small to guard the 4 and not quick enough to guard most NBA 3′s. But he is a guy who knows how to play the game and finds a way to produce. I would expect nothing less of him in the NBA.

29. Chicago Bulls: Will Barton, Memphis

The Conference USA Player of the Year  is rising up draft boards and can be the 2-guard the Bulls are looking for.

He averaged 18.0 points and 8.0 rebounds while shooting 50.9 percent from the floor. He has the ability to produce and could become the replacement for Richard Hamilton down the road.

In addition, he gives the Bulls another scoring option next to Derrick Rose, which they badly need.

30. Golden State Warriors (via San Antonio Spurs): John Jenkins, Vanderbilt    

Jenkins has unlimited range, a lightning-quick release and could provide some secondary scoring in Golden State.

You can never have too much shooting. Jenkins could be the best pure shooter in the draft, knocking down 44 percent of his long-range attempts on the season.

He could add some valuable bench scoring for the Warriors and could possibly crack the starting lineup, moving Klay Thompson to the 3.

Second Round Projections

31. Charlotte Bobcats: Kim English, Missouri

32. Washington Wizards: Festus Ezeli, Vanderbilt

33. Cleveland Cavaliers: Evan Fournier, France

34. Cleveland Cavaliers: Doron Lamb, Kentucky

35. Golden State Warriors: Scott Machado, Iona

36. Sacramento Kings: Kyle O’Quinn, Norfolk State

37. Toronto Raptors: Kostas Papanikolaou, Greece

38. Denver Nuggets: Miles Plumlee, Duke

39. Detroit Pistons: Jared Cunningham, Oregon State

40. Portland Trail Blazers: Orlando Johnson, UC-Santa Barbara

41. Portland Trail Blazers: Mike Scott, Virginia

42. Milwaukee Bucks: Tomas Satoransky, Czech Republic

43. Atlanta Hawks: Furkan Aldemir, Turkey

44. Detroit Pistons: Darius Miller, Kentucky

45. Philadelphia 76ers: Kevin Murphy, Tennessee Tech

46. New Orleans Hornets: Tyshawn Taylor, Kansas

47. Utah Jazz: Robbie Hummel, Purdue

48. New York Knicks: Jae Crowder, Marquette

49. Orlando Magic: Chris Johnson, Dayton

50. Denver Nuggets: Benard James, Florida State

51. Boston Celtics: Justin Hamilton, LSU

52. Golden State Warriors: Darius Johnson-Odom, Marquette

53. Los Angeles Clippers: Quincy Acy, Baylor

54. Philadelphia 76ers: Kevin Jones, West Virginia

55. Dallas Mavericks: Hollis Thompson, Georgetown

56. Toronto Raptors: Kris Middleton, Texas A&M

57. Brooklyn Nets: Drew Gordon, New Mexico

58. Minnesota Timberwolves: Alex Young, IUPUI

59. San Antonio Spurs: William Buford, Ohio State

60. Los Angles Lakers: Kris Joseph, Syracuse

Follow Matt Shetler on Twitter for news, reaction and analysis from around the NBA.

Apr 2, 2012; New Orleans, LA, USA; Kentucky Wildcats forward Anthony Davis waves to the crowd after cutting down a piece of the net after the finals of the 2012 NCAA men

With Kentucky’s Anthony Davis set to become the 28th No. 1 overall pick since the NBA Draft Lottery began in 1985, now is the perfect time to take a look back at defats of the past.

There have been some outstanding players selected with the No. 1 overall pick, but there have also been some total busts that have gone No. 1 overall as well.

Here’s a look back through time as I rank all of the No. 1 picks through the lottery era.

Note: Players were ranked on statistics, championships, longevity, etc.

27.  Kwame Brown, 2001, Washington Wizards: When you talked about bad No. 1 picks, Brown’s name has to be at the top of the list. In 12 NBA seasons, Brown has averaged only 6.8 points and 5.8 rebounds per game. He should have been sign No. 1 that Michael Jordan wouldn’t make a good executive. The sad part is that Brown has made $58.7 million in his career.

26.  Greg Oden, 2007, Portland Trail Blazers: You have to feel bad for Oden, but the facts are that injuries have made him one of the worst No. 1 picks ever. In five NBA seasons, Oden has managed to play in only a total of 82 games.

25.  Michael Olowokandi, 1998, Los Angeles Clippers: The “Kandi Man,” had a pair of average seasons in 2002 and 2003, but overall was a complete bust that averaged only 8.3 points and 6.8 rebounds per game in his nine-year NBA career.

24.  Pervis Ellison, 1989, Sacramento Kings:  Ellison was the NBA’s Most Improved Player in 1992 when he averaged 20.0 points and 11.2 boards per night, but that was as good as it got for Ellison during his 11-year NBA career that saw him finish with averages of 9.5 points and 6.7 rebounds.

23.  Joe Smith, 1995, Golden State Warriors: Smith’s career got off to a good start when he was named to the NBA All-rookie First team, but other than that, his career was that of nothing more than a journeyman. Smith averaged 10.9 points and 6.4 rebounds throughout the course of 15 NBA seasons.

May 15, 2012; San Antonio, Texas, USA; Los Angeles Clippers guard Mo Williams (25) is helped off the floor by teammate Kenyon Martin (2) during the first half in game one of the Western Conference semifinals of the 2012 NBA Playoffs against the San Antonio Spurs at the AT

22.  Kenyon Martin, 2000, New Jersey Nets: Martin was an All-Star in 2004, but he’s been nothing more than average during the course of his 12-year NBA career, averaging a modest 13.0 points and 7.1 rebounds.

21.  John Wall, 2010, Washington Wizards: Wall is blessed with enormous speed and talent, but must become a better leader and shooter before he can take his game to the next level. The talent is there though.

20.  Andrew Bogut, 2005, Milwaukee Bucks: Bogut has dealt with injuries throughout his eight year NBA career and not only was a NBA All-Rookie First Team member in 2006, but an All-NBA Third Team selection in 2010. He could likely be a few spots higher if the injuries haven’t slowed him down.

19.  Andrea Bargnani, 2006, Toronto Raptors: Bargnani has a ton of talent and really started to emerge in 2012 before injuries set him back as well. He’s averaged a solid 20.5 points per game the past two seasons.

18.  Danny Manning, 1988, Los Angeles Clippers: I always wonder how good Manning could have been if it wasn’t for the devastating knee injury as a rookie. Regardless he forged out a good career averaging 14.0 points per game and 5.2 rebounds, winning the Sixth Man of the Year award in 1998.

15.  Glenn Robinson, 1994, Milwaukee Bucks: Robinson was a two-time All-Star and won a ring in 2005, but he’s a guy who never really lived up to the hype coming out of Purdue. In 11 NBA seasons, Robinson averaged a solid 20.7 points and 6.1 rebounds per game.

17.  Derrick Coleman, 1990, New Jersey Nets: Coleman had a decent NBA career, winning the Rookie of the Year award in 1991 and made the All-Star team in 1994. He finished his NBA career averaging 16.5 points and 9.3 rebounds.

16.  Kyrie Irving, 2011, Cleveland Cavaliers: I really like what Irving brought to Cleveland during his Rookie of the Year campaign in 2012. He has unbelievable speed and a natural point guard. He’s a little high on the list but I love his potential.

15.  Glenn Robinson, 1994, Milwaukee Bucks: Robinson was a two-time All-Star and won a ring in 2005, but he’s a guy who never really lived up to the hype coming out of Purdue. In 11 NBA seasons, Robinson averaged a solid 20.7 points and 6.1 rebounds per game.

14.  Elton Brand, 1999, Chicago Bulls: People forget how good Brand was early in his career for the Bulls and Clippers, posting six career seasons of 20+ points per game.

13.  Blake Griffin, 2009, Los Angeles Clippers: Griffin, in two seasons, has won the Rookie of the Year and made a pair of All-Star teams. In addition, he’s the most explosive player in the NBA right now and has averaged 21.7 points and 11.5 rebounds per game. He has a ways to go before Griffin is a complete player, but he’s well on his way.

12.  Brad Daugherty, 1986, Cleveland Cavaliers: Daugherty’s career was cut short due to back problems, but during his eight NBA seasons he was very good, averaging 19.0 points and 9.5 rebounds per game, making the All-Star Game on five different occasions.

November 10, 2010; Washington, DC, USA; Houston Rockets center Yao Ming (11) against the Washington Wizards during the first half at the Verizon Center. Mandatory Credit: Rafael Suanes-US PRESSWIRE

11.  Yao Ming, 2002, Houston Rockets: Ming also saw his career cut short due to injury, but while in a Rockets uniform he was very good. He was an eight-time All-Star and averaged 19.0 points and 9.2 rebounds in his eight-year NBA career.

10.  Larry Johnson, 1991, Charlotte Hornets: LJ also dealt with injuries throughout his 10-year NBA career, but while healthy he was a solid 16.2 and 7.5 guy with the Hornets and Knicks combined.

9.  Chris Webber, 1993, Orlando Magic: Webber was the Rookie of the Year in 1994 and a five-time All-Star during his 15 year NBA career. Similar to Johnson though, C-Web had a very good NBA career but never really showed the signs of dominance for a length period of time.

8.  Dwight Howard, 2004, Orlando Magic: All the whining and complaining aside, Howard has become the best big man in the game today, averaging 18.4 points, 13.0 rebounds and 2.2 blocks during his eight seasons in Orlando to date. In addition he’s won the Defensive Player of the Year three different times, been named to the All-NBA first team five times and is a six time All-Star.

7.  Derrick Rose, 2008, Chicago Bulls: Rose became the youngest MVP in NBA history in 2011 and has a Rookie of the Year and three All-Star selections on his resume already.

6.  Patrick Ewing, 1985, New York Knicks: The only thing missing from Ewing’s resume is a championship. He was the Rookie of the Year in 1986, a member of the original Dream Team and an 11-time All-Star. Ewing played in the NBA 17 years and averaged 21.0 points and 9.8 rebounds.

5.  David Robinson, 1987, San Antonio Spurs: “The Admiral,” was one of the NBA’s best ever and was a 10-time All-Star, a league MVP (1995) and the Defensive Player of the Year (1992). In addition Robinson won a pair of NBA titles. Something interesting on this list is that of all the No. 1 picks, only Glenn and David Robinson has won a championship so far.

4. Allen Iverson, 1996, Philadelphia 76ers: Iverson was one of the toughest players the NBA has ever seen and all his off the court issues aside; he was one of the best pure scorers (26.7 PPG) the league has ever seen. In addition, A.I. won the MVP in 2001 and was an 11-time All-Star.

3.  Shaquille O’Neal, 1992, Orlando Magic: One of the most dominant big men in NBA history, Shaq won an MVP in 200 and made 15 All-Star teams. He won four rings and finished his career averaging 23.7 points and 10.9 rebounds.

2.  Tim Duncan, 1997, San Antonio Spurs: Quite simply Duncan is the best power forward in NBA history. He has won four title, the MVP twice and been named an All-Star on 13 different occasions. He’s still going strong and has career numbers of 20.3 points and 11.3 rebounds per game.

1.  LeBron James, 2003, Cleveland Cavaliers: There’s no real explanation needed here, but LBJ is one of the most gifted players NBA fans have ever seen. He finally got his ring this year and has won three MVP awards. In addition to the accolades are career numbers of 27.6 points, 7.2 rebounds, 6.9 assists and 1.7 steals. Like him or not, LeBron deserves the top spot.

Follow Matt Shetler on Twitter for news, reaction and analysis from around the NBA.

Follow Buckets Over Broadway on Twitter

The Buckets Over Broadway radio show was back with a bang on Tuesday as I was joined by B.O.B. lead writer Greg Kaplan.

On this week’s episode, we looked back at the NBA Finals and LeBron James winning his first ring and if there will be any pressure on Knicks star Carmelo Anthony to win that elusive ring.

In addition, Greg and I discussed the Knicks strategy in the draft, J.R. Smith declining his option, how deep the Knicks could be in 2013, whether or not Mike Woodson is the right coach for this team and much more.

More importantly we figured out who the true creator of the Steve Novak fan club truly is. You can listen to this week’s episode by clicking the link below.

Follow Matt Shetler on Twitter for news, reaction and analysis from around the NBA.

Follow Buckets Over Broadway on Twitter

Follow Greg Kaplan on Twitter

So, the remaining question is, what is a fair level of expectation to put on whoever the Knicks draft 48th overall?

Its easy to get wrapped up in the potential and hype every player has entering the draft. I’m sure plenty of fans are hoping the Knicks discover the next Monta Ellis or Dejuan Blair, both players that fell to the second round who have made a huge impact with their respective teams. Or, some fans may even be thinking the Knicks will find another hidden gem in the later round like they did with Landry Fields, who went from a relative unknown to a regular in the New York line-up.

A lot of scouts and insiders have painted this incoming draft class as one of the deepest in recent memory. However, don’t expect much of that impact talent to reach the Knicks patiently (or impatiently) waiting at 48th. Any player the Knicks are likely to bring in at their scheduled slot will not fill any immediate needs for this team as far as their 2012-13 gameplan is concerned.

What I mean by that is, say, for example, the Knicks are to draft Scott Machado, poing guard out of Iona. Bringing in Machado, who could one day very easily be a better-than-average back-up point guard who sees 20+ minutes a night, won’t exclude the Knicks from looking at players like Jason Kidd or Raymond Felton to fill an immediate gap with their Mid Level Exception. Machado, regardless of how much he impresses scouts or people in the organization, would not and should not be trusted with back-up duties as a green rookie. Jeremy Lin isn’t experienced enough himself for the Knicks to take a chance like that.

Even players with above-average scoring ability right now won’t keep the Knicks from other options on the free agent market. The best expectation to have on a second round pick this season is to have almost no expectations for them until 2013-14, when they’re one year wiser and have spent a full season in practice and in training sessions to prepare them for the beast that is the NBA season.

So, while I would personally love to see the Knicks selected Darius Johnson-Odm (how awesome would it be if Gus Johnson was still doing Knicks games? D! J! OHHHHHH!!!), I don’t expect him, or Machado, or a Kim English, or a William Buford to make a huge splash for the team next year. That would be unrealistic of me, or anyone.

Instead, let’s hope the Knicks select the right talent, and hope that player can make an impact one day, if not today.

In my latest mock draft, I take a look at exactly where the top prospects in the game will land. Check back on Thursday morning as I will release my final mock draft the morning of the draft.

With that being said, let’s jump right into it.

1. New Orleans Hornets: Anthony Davis, Kentucky

The Hornets won the lottery and will strike gold with Davis. He’s a shot-blocking machine and also skilled offensively. He’s a franchise changer for the Hornets.

2. Charlotte Bobcats: Thomas Robinson, Kansas 

Charlotte could trade the pick or go with Bradley Beal or Harrison Barnes here, but taking the athletic and relentless power forward who posted 27 double-doubles on the year at Kansas seems like a pretty safe pick.

March 24, 2012; Phoenix, AZ, USA; Florida Gators guard Bradley Beal (23) shoots over Louisville Cardinals guard/forward Kyle Kuric (14) during the second half in the finals of the west region of the 2012 NCAA men

3. Washington Wizards: Bradley Beal, Florida            

Ernie Grunfeld’s trade to acquire Trevor Ariza and Emeka Okafor cleared the way for taking Beal with this pick. He’ll be the ideal complement to John Wall in the backcourt, and while the trade accomplished little for the Wizards’ future, Beal has the chance to be outstanding.

4. Cleveland Cavaliers: Harrison Barnes, North Carolina

The Cavs have loved Barnes for over a year now, and they have enough energy guys already, which should be the deciding factor between Barnes and Michael Kidd-Gilchrist.

What the Cavs need is a guy who can fill it up, and Barnes is that, as the 17.1 points per game he averaged on the season should translate nicely to the NBA.

5. Sacramento Kings: Michael-Kidd Gilchrist, Kentucky

The Kings need a big guy badly, but MKG is the perfect player for Kings coach Keith Smart.

They have enough scoring. MKG is a hard-playing, athletic, physical small forward who doesn’t have to score to make an impact. The Kings had the worst defense in the NBA a season ago, allowing an average of 104.4 points per game, and MKG should help improve that.

6. Portland Trail Blazers (via New Jersey Nets): Damian Lillard, Weber State

He adds the dynamic backcourt scorer (24.5 PPG) that the Blazers need and brings a sense of toughness to the team. He’s an outstanding shooter and has the ability to run an NBA offense.

The Blazers need a point guard, and I love Lillard here for them.

7. Golden State Warriors: Andre Drummond, Connecticut

The Warriors are in need of a small forward, but with the top ones not on the board any longer, they can add the big man they’ve been in search of for a long time.

Even though they acquired Andrew Bogut, Drummond has as much upside as anyone in the draft. It’s a roll of the dice, but it’s difficult to pass on someone with the physical package of Drummond.

8. Toronto Raptors: Dion Waiters, Syracuse

Waiters adds the ability to get to the rim from the guard position, which is something the Raptors need badly as right now there is nothing but jump shooters on their roster.

Toronto is a team that could trade out of this spot, but with Waiters’ stock rising in the fashion that it is, it’s hard to see him sliding past this spot. He’s tough and adds scoring.

9. Detroit Pistons: John Henson, North Carolina

Mar 23, 2012; St. Louis, MO, USA; North Carolina Tar Heels forward John Henson (31) shoots as Ohio Bobcats forward Ivo Baltic (23) defends during the first half of the semifinals in the midwest region of the 2012 NCAA men

Henson can rebound (10.1 RPG) and block shots (2.9 BPG), which are qualities the Pistons need in a frontcourt guy to pair with Greg Monroe.

He also will make Detroit much more athletic, which is a must with this pick. They can build around a Monroe-Henson frontcourt in the future, which will be nice building blocks.

10. New Orleans Hornets (via Minnesota Timberwolves): Austin Rivers, Duke

The Hornets can go multiple ways with this pick, but Rivers also provides them with insurance in case restricted free agent Eric Gordon leaves.

In addition, Rivers provides the Hornets with perimeter scoring, long-range shooting and potential star power, all things the Hornets need badly. Adding Davis and Rivers will make this a very good draft for New Orleans.

The future looks bright in New Orleans

11. Portland Trail Blazers: Meyers Leonard, Illinois

He won’t be a star right away, but has a ton of overall talent. With Leonard, Portland gets size, athletic ability and a ton of upside.

Leonard had an outstanding combine, and his stock is way up and could fill the need in the middle for the Blazers. He’s a legitimate seven-footer who is a freak athlete and can be a true center in the league.

12. Milwaukee Bucks: Arnett Moultrie, Mississippi State   

He’s a guy that averaged 16.4 points and 10.5 rebounds on the season and is a big that can stretch the floor. He not only shot 54.9 percent from the floor on the season, but also 44.4 percent from behind the arc.

He’s big and strong enough to play the 4 or the 5, but athletic enough to run the floor like a guard.

Moultrie gives the Bucks the interior presence that they need badly.

13. Phoenix Suns: Perry Jones III, Baylor

Mar 25, 2012; Atlanta, GA, USA; Baylor Bears forward Perry Jones III (1) dunks against the Kentucky Wildcats during the second half in the finals of the south region of the 2012 NCAA men

Jones was a 4 in college but is likely a 3 in the NBA, and while he wowed scouts at the combine, he hasn’t been able to put together consistent individual workouts since.

He has all the tools in the world, but only averaged 13.5 points and 7.6 rebounds on the season, which is way below what his skill set would suggest.

He’s just too skilled to fall any further.

14. Houston Rockets: Terrence Ross, Washington

Ross can score from the inside or outside, averaging 16.4 points while shooting 37 percent from behind the arc. In addition, he can defend, handles the ball well and is one of the best rebounding guards in the draft, pulling down 6.4 boards per night.

Ross has great size for a 2-guard at 6’6” and can do anything on the floor very well. The Rockets need backcourt depth, and they get a real good player here. I wouldn’t be surprised, though, if Ross finds a way to sneak into the top 10.

15. Philadelphia 76ers: Jeremy Lamb, Connecticut

They need a go-to-guy, and Lamb could be exactly that, as he averaged 17.7 points per game while at UConn. The Sixers desperately need someone that can fill it up from the perimeter, and Lamb could give Doug Collins a much-needed sniper.

Lamb is young, but has a ton of upside and could be a steal at No. 15 for the Sixers. He not only can extend his game beyond the arc—shooting 33.6 percent from three-point range—but has a devastating mid-range game.

16. Houston Rockets (via New York Knicks): Tyler Zeller, North Carolina

Zeller is athletic, can run the floor well and has very good leaping skills.

He’s also very good fundamentally and has a soft touch around the rim, shooting 55 percent from the floor during his senior season at North Carolina. Houston also needs a productive big man, and while he won’t become an All-Star, I do see Zeller being a productive NBA big.

17. Dallas Mavericks: Kendall Marshall, North Carolina   

He’s outstanding decision-maker, averaging 9.8 assists per game and posting a 3.48 assist-to-turnover ratio, and down the road could bring some of the things to the Mavericks that Jason Kidd did.

Marshall is the best pure floor general in the draft and makes passing the rock look much easier than it really is. He also has the rare ability to make everyone around him better.

18. Minnesota Timberwolves (via Utah Jazz): Moe Harkless, St. John’s

Minnesota might not get a shooter here, so taking the best available player isn’t the worst strategy.

Harkless impressed at the combine with his shooting and athleticism and has a very bright future ahead of him. His perimeter shooting will improve, but adding a high-character kid who can score and rebound isn’t the worst move here.

19. Orlando Magic: Terrence Jones, Kentucky

Jones is very athletic, strong and is a good finisher and rebounder in traffic. He’s also a guy that can score at all three levels, shooting 50 percent from the floor and 33 percent from behind the arc.

Orlando won’t get a Dwight Howard replacement (if it moves him) this low, so taking the best available player makes sense.

20. Denver Nuggets: Andrew Nicholson, St. Bonaventure

No one in this draft may be more skilled and versatile on the offensive end than Nicholson. He’s also more athletic than he looks and will fit in nicely in George Karl’s up-tempo offense.

Nicholson has the ability to stretch the floor, averaging 18.5 points per game, shot 57 percent from the floor and 43 percent from behind the arc. 

There’s not much on the floor that he doesn’t do well and could contribute immediately and add depth in Denver.

21. Boston Celtics: Jared Sullinger, Ohio State

Despite averaging 17.5 points and 9.2 rebounds on the season, there were plenty of question marks surrounding Sullinger.

I wasn’t as high on him before the medical red flag, but that should certainly cause him to slide in the draft.

However, the rewards could outweigh the risks this low, and I do love Sullinger’s post-game. Boston could use a banger in the post, and Sullinger can do that.

22. Boston Celtics (via Los Angeles Clippers): Royce White, Iowa State    

White is a player that I think can come in and be a surprise from day one. He can score (13.4 PPG) and rebound (9.3 RPG), but while he stands 6’9”, White sees the floor like a guard. His 5.0 assists per game led Iowa State and actually ranked him fifth in the Big 12 Conference.

Down the road, White could be the eventual replacement for Paul Pierce.

23. Atlanta Hawks: Quincy Miller, Baylor

Miller isn’t close to being NBA-ready, but there’s no doubting his raw talent, and a couple years down the road, he could emerge as the Hawks top scoring option.

24. Cleveland Cavaliers (via Los Angeles Lakers): Fab Melo, Syracuse

Mar 9, 2012; New York, NY, USA; Syracuse Orange center Fab Melo (51) shoots a free throw against the Cincinnati Bearcats during the first half of the semifinals of the Big East Tournament at Madison Square Garden. Mandatory Credit: Debby Wong-US PRESSWIRE

Melo has nothing that resembles a post-game and has a very low basketball IQ. But he measured 7’0”, and while he’s raw offensively, he can contribute immediately as a shot-blocker (2.9 BPG) and has the size to be a good rebounder.

With the fact that the Cavs are in need of size, he’s worth a roll of the dice this late. Melo has potential, but has a long ways to go before he makes himself a quality NBA big man.

25. Memphis Grizzlies: Tony Wroten, Washington

Wroten has the raw skills to become the best guard in this draft, but first must find something that resembles a jump shot and learn to take care of the basketball.

The Grizzlies have the luxury of allowing him to develop for a while, but he could reward their patience down the road.

26. Indiana Pacers: Marquis Teague, Kentucky

Teague will need time to develop, but he was impressive in March, as he really came on strong in helping lead Kentucky to the national championship. 

The Pacers could look at Teague as their point guard of the future here and ultimately could lead to them shopping Darren Collison.

27. Miami Heat: Jeff Taylor, Vanderbilt

The champs have the opportunity here to add another elite athlete.

Taylor is an outstanding perimeter defender and has range on his jumper, knocking down 42 percent of his attempts from behind the arc.

28. Oklahoma City Thunder: Draymond Green, Michigan State   

Green does a little bit of everything and does it all very well. He makes his teammates better and will be a good asset coming off the bench in Oklahoma City, who are just really drafting for depth here.

29. Chicago Bulls: John Jenkins, Vanderbilt

You can never have too much shooting. Jenkins could be the best pure shooter in the draft, knocking down 44 percent of his long-range attempts on the season. Jenkins has unlimited range, a lightning-quick release and could provide some secondary scoring in Chicago.

He will add some scoring in Chicago and could eventually turn into the replacement for Richard Hamilton.

30. Golden State Warriors (via San Antonio Spurs): Doron Lamb, Kentucky

The Warriors can add some additional shooting here with Lamb, and when he’s going well, he can be lethal, shooting 44 percent from behind the arc for the Wildcats on the season.

First Five Out

Festus Ezeli, Vanderbilt

Evan Fournier, France

Jared Cunningham, Oregon State

Will Barton, Memphis

Drew Gordon, New Mexico

Follow Matt Shetler on Twitter for news, reaction and analysis from around the NBA.

Follow Buckets Over Broadway on Twitter

That leaves only individual workouts for certain prospects to attempt to improve their draft stock. With such a deep draft, several prospects drafted later in the first round will end up outperforming the position they are drafted in.

The Knicks don’t have a first-round pick, but the draft is always fun to try and figure out.

In my latest mock draft, I focus in on these guys who will be a bit of a surprise to the teams that end up drafting them.

1. New Orleans Hornets: Anthony Davis, Kentucky

Apr 2, 2012; New Orleans, LA, USA; Kentucky Wildcats forward Anthony Davis waves to the crowd after cutting down a piece of the net after the finals of the 2012 NCAA men

Davis is a lock to be the No. 1 pick, and while there’s a ton of hype and expectations for him coming in, I think he meets those expectations from day one and makes a pretty significant impact as a rookie.

2. Charlotte Bobcats: Thomas Robinson, Kansas

How the top of the first round plays out all depends what the Bobcats do with this pick. If they end up keeping it, I like Robinson here.

He’s ready to contribute right away, and down the road, could turn himself into a pretty solid double-double machine after recording 27 of them on the season at Kansas.

3. Washington Wizards:  Michael Kidd-Gilchrist, Kentucky               

MKG is a safe pick here for the Wizards.

He brings character and leadership to a team that desperately needs an injection of both. He may not be a top scoring option in the NBA, but his athleticism should make him a pretty productive NBA player.

4. Cleveland Cavaliers:  Bradley Beal, Florida

The Cavs have liked Harrison Barnes for two years now, but with Beal still on the board, it’s difficult to pass on him.

The Florida product averaged 14.8 points per game on the season and could turn into the best pure scorer in the draft. Paired with Kyrie Irving, this Cleveland backcourt could be among the best in the NBA in a couple of years.

5. Sacramento Kings: Andre Drummond, Connecticut

The Kings need a big man to play with DeMarcus Cousins, and at No. 5, they can’t pass on the upside of Drummond.

It may take some time for him to reach his potential, but if he does, Drummond could be the most talented overall player in the draft.

6. Portland Trail Blazers (via New Jersey Nets): Damian Lillard, Weber State

Mar 7, 2012; Missoula, MT, USA; Weber State Wildcats guard Damian Lillard (1) attempts a free throw against the Montana Grizzlies during the first half of the finals of the 2012 Big Sky Tournament at Adams Center. Mandatory Credit: James Snook-US PRESSWIRE

Lillard was the talk of last week’s combine in Chicago and could be a perfect fit for Portland at No. 6.

They need a point guard, and Lillard is the top one on the board. He can shoot the ball, averaging 24.5 points per game while shooting 47 percent from the floor, 41 percent from behind the arc and 89 percent from the charity stripe.

He’s s a guy that I feel can put up No. 1 type pick numbers as a rookie and could be a serious Rookie of the Year candidate based on his scoring ability.

As far as playing the point guard position goes, he can do that as well. He’s was asked to score more at Weber State, but still tallied a 2-to-1 assist-to-turnover ratio.

7. Golden State Warriors: Harrison Barnes, North Carolina

I’ve been up and down on Barnes all season, but he’s a good fit for the Warriors, who need some scoring production from the small forward spot.

That’s something Barnes can definitely provide after averaging 17.1 points per game on the season.

8. Toronto Raptors: Dion Waiters, Syracuse

Toronto general manager Bryan Colangelo said he’s not the one who made Waiters a lottery promise, but not too many other teams make sense enough for Waiters to cancel all his workouts.

Even if the Raptors aren’t the team who gave the Syracuse product a draft promise, there’s no rule against taking him here.

9. Detroit Pistons:  Perry Jones III, Baylor

Jones helps the Pistons get more athletic and is a guy that can play the 3 or the 4, although I see him more as an NBA 3.

Considering the knocks on him and lack of consistent production in college (13.5 PPG, 7.6 RPG), Jones is going to be drafted on his potential.

But he’s a guy that I feel whose game is more suited for the NBA.

The guy runs like a deer and can jump through the gym. He’s also a guy that could be out to prove the doubters wrong, so I foresee a big rookie year for Jones.

10. New Orleans Hornets (via Minnesota Timberwolves): Austin Rivers, Duke

Duke is also a guy who The Sporting News reported may have a lottery promise and could make sense here for New Orleans, depending on what they decide to do with Eric Gordon, who is a restricted free agent.

I don’t think he will explode as a rookie, but Rivers has natural scoring ability (15.5 PPG) and has the potential to become an NBA star.

11. Portland Trail Blazers:  Meyers Leonard, Illinois

Leonard also created a ton of buzz at the combine and has seen his stock shoot way up.

Portend needs a big man for the future, and coming out of this draft with Lillard and Leonard could give the Blazers two building blocks for the future.

12. Milwaukee Bucks: Jared Sullinger, Ohio State   

Mar 31, 2012; New Orleans, LA, USA; Ohio State Buckeyes forward Jared Sullinger (0) reacts following their defeat against the Kansas Jayhawks in the semifinals of the 2012 NCAA men

I think Sullinger can be a decent NBA forward, but I have doubts how good he can be.

He’s not the greatest athlete in the world and could struggle against longer and more athletic defenders. But his post-game looks very good, and given the fact that Milwaukee needs low-post production, he may be worth a roll of the dice.

13. Phoenix Suns: Terrence Ross, Washington

If you’re looking for a guy that can come in and produce right away as a rookie, look no further than Washington’s Ross.

You name it and he does it well.

He’s got good size for a 2-guard at close to 6’7” and can score the ball from both the inside and outside, shooting 46 percent from the floor and 37 percent from behind the arc.

Ross is also one of the best rebounding guards in the draft, averaging 6.4 boards per game.

Some of the other shooting guards such as Rivers, Beal and Jeremy Lamb get all the attention, but Ross is as good, if not better than most of them.

14. Houston Rockets: Jeremy Lamb, Connecticut 

Lamb is a nice fit for the Rockets at No. 14, as Houston needs quality backcourt depth.

Lamb has the ability to become a No. 1 scoring option after averaging 17.7 points per game at UConn. With Kevin Martin’s contract set to expire after the 2013 season, the Rockets could elect to move Martin if Lamb pans out early on.

15. Philadelphia 76ers: John Henson, North Carolina

He’s raw offensively, but he can help a team’s interior defense right away.

Henson is an outstanding athlete who can help the Sixers by rebounding (10.1 RPG) and blocking shots (2.9 BPG).

He’s a great athlete that runs the floor very well, so he will find a way to be productive as his post-game develops.

16. Houston Rockets (via New York Knicks): Tyler Zeller, North Carolina

Mar 25, 2012; St. Louis, MO, USA; North Carolina Tar Heels forward Tyler Zeller (44) shoots against the Kansas Jayhawks during the first half of the finals of the midwest region of the 2012 NCAA men

I don’t think Zeller will be an All-Star, but I think he can be more productive than most people would give him credit for.

He’s athletic and can run the floor well and also has very good leaping skills.

Zeller is very good fundamentally and has a soft touch around the rim, shooting 55 percent from the floor during his senior season.

His numbers improved in each of his four seasons at North Carolina, and while he won’t average the 16.6 points and 9.6 rebounds he did during his senior season, he fills a need in Houston and will be surprisingly productive.

17. Dallas Mavericks: Kendall Marshall, North Carolina   

Should the Mavs select Marshall, they get a point guard similar to the one they had in Jason Kidd, a guy that is an effortless passer and outstanding decision maker (9.8 APG).

He may have to work on some things offensively, but he sees the floor great, and as a facilitator, there’s none better in the draft than Marshall. He takes care of the ball, evident by a 3.48 assist-to-turnover ratio and is the rare type of player that makes everyone on the floor better.

18. Minnesota Timberwolves (via Utah Jazz): Arnett Moultrie, Mississippi State

Moultrie’s decision not to work out during the combine was stunning, but he’s a good fit here for Minnesota.

With the top shooting guards already off the board, instead of reaching for one, adding frontcourt depth here is a plus. While I see him as a 4 in the NBA, Moultrie can play the 4 or the 5.

While he has the strength to play either spot, he has the athleticism of a guard. He’s a guy with a very bright future.

19. Orlando Magic: Moe Harkless, St. Johns

Harkless is another guy who impressed at the combine with his shooting and athleticism.

It’s about time the Magic prepare to start over and adding the high upside of Harkless is a good way to start.

20. Denver Nuggets: Terrence Jones, Kentucky

Jones would be an ideal candidate for a guy to get drafted late and come in and offer production, but while I like him here for Denver, there might not be an opportunity for a ton of minutes right off the bat.

Denver doesn’t have any immediate holes, so they can take the best player on the board. Right now, I have that as Jones.

21. Boston Celtics: Andrew Nicholson, St. Bonaventure

Mar 11, 2012; Atlantic City, NJ, USA; St. Bonaventure Bonnies forward Andrew Nicholson (44) on the foul line Xavier Musketeers during the first half in the finals of the 2012 Atlantic 10 Tournament at Boardwalk Hall. Mandatory Credit: Jim O

Nicholson also was impressive at the combine, and I think he’s a guy that can contribute from the start, especially if the Celtics and Kevin Garnett part ways.

He knows how to play the game and produces across the board, averaging 18.5 points, 8.4 rebounds and 2.0 blocks per game.

In addition, Nicholson shot 57 percent from the floor and 43 percent from behind the arc.

I love him for Boston here and think he can come in and be very productive 

22. Boston Celtics (via Los Angeles Clippers):  Fab Melo, Syracuse    

Boston needs size, and drafting Melo makes sense, as he’s a solid 7’0” and can block shots (2.9 BPG).

He’s raw offensively and may take some time to develop, but the skills are there, as Melo shot 57.6 percent from the floor during his two years at Syracuse.

23. Atlanta Hawks: Royce White, Iowa State 

White is another guy I like to produce as a rookie.

He’s got good size at 6’9”, but shows the ability of a guard.

White averaged 13.4 points and 9.3 rebounds on the year, but also led the Iowa State team and ranked fifth in the Big 12 Conference in assists (5.0 APG).

He had some off-the-court issues in the past, but interviewed great at the combine. He’s a guy that can help the Hawks immediately.

24. Cleveland Cavaliers (via Los Angeles Lakers): Jeff Taylor, Vanderbilt

Cleveland needs to get more athletic, and Taylor is a guy that can do a lot of things. He’s a very good perimeter defender, can get to the rim and finally developed a perimeter shot (42 percent).

25. Memphis Grizzlies: Doron Lamb, Kentucky

Memphis needs someone that can hit the perimeter shot, and Lamb could be a steal here, as he’s a lethal shooter, knocking down 47 percent of his three-point attempts.

26. Indiana Pacers: Marquis Teague, Kentucky

Apr 2, 2012; New Orleans, LA, USA; Kentucky Wildcats guard Marquis Teague (25) lays the ball up against the Kansas Jayhawks during the first half of the finals in the 2012 NCAA men

The Pacers could look at Teague as their point guard of the future here.

He will need time to develop, but was impressive in March, as he really came on strong in helping lead Kentucky to the national championship.
27. Miami Heat: Quincy Miller, Baylor

After disappointing big-time at the combine, Miller may have played his way out of the first round, but makes sense here for Miami.

He’s got a ton of upside, and the Heat can afford to take their time with him.

28. Oklahoma City Thunder: Draymond Green, Michigan State   

Green looked great physically at the combine and may sneak into the first round because of it.

He doesn’t do anything great, but does a lot of things very well. The Thunder just need depth here, and Green is a guy that can come off the bench and produce.

29. Chicago Bulls: John Jenkins, Vanderbilt

Jenkins could be the best shooter in the draft, connecting on 44 percent of his shots from behind the arc. The Bulls need other scoring options, and Jenkins is a guy who, down the road, could turn into a replacement for Richard Hamilton.

30. Golden State Warriors (via San Antonio Spurs): Festus Ezeli, Vanderbilt   

Ezeli is a big body that can help the Warriors rebound (5.9 RPG) the ball and block shots (2.0 BPG).

Adding more size is a plus here for Golden State if they keep the pick, and while Ezeli is raw offensively, he has some talent, averaging 10.0 points per game and shooting 60 percent from the floor.

Follow Matt Shetler on Twitter for news, reaction and analysis from around the NBA.

According to Emiliano Carchia of Sportando, the Bosnian forward is drawing interest from the New York Knicks, Brooklyn Nets, Cleveland Cavaliers, and Phoenix Suns.

Teletovic, 26, is still under contract with Spain’s Caja Laboral for two more seasons, but his contract can be bought out, which would allow him to make the move to the NBA.

He’s considered a power forward, but he is one of the better three-point shooters in Europe, averaging 3.1 three-pointers per game on 43.1% shooting this season. Teletovic averaged 21.7 points and 6.0 rebounds during his season.

Where the Knicks run into trouble in an attempt to sign Teletovic is that the other three teams all have considerably much more cap space than the Knicks.

Luke Adams of Hoops Rumors reported earlier in the week that there was mutual interest between Teletovic and the Nets.

Mar 23, 2012; Atlanta, GA, USA; Xavier Musketeers guard Tu Holloway (52) shoots Baylor Bears forward Quincy Miller (30) during the first half in the semi-finals of the south region of the 2012 NCAA men

The 22-year old Holloway was the Atlantic 10 Conference Player of the Year during his junior season and although he regressed a bit as a senior, Holloway still averaged 17.5 points per game to go along with 4.9 assists.

The Knicks worked out Holloway the last week of May and he’s an intriguing prospect for New York as the Knicks lack of point guard depth right now has been heavily documented.

As a scorer, Holloway mostly relies on his jumper, which can be a bit inconsistent at times. He was a 43 percent shooter from the floor and a 35 percent shooter from behind the arc. Holloway is best when he is presented with catch-and-shoot situations, but his pull-up game is pretty effective as well.

However against bigger and better defenders in the NBA, I worry about how much space he will have to be strictly a jump shooter.

He can attack the rim, but more so in transition than in the half-court set, which could present a problem in Mike Woodson’s offense.

I like him as a distributor though as he has a good feel for the game and makes good decisions overall. It’s an area of his game that he still needs to improve though as taking care of the ball was an issue this year, turning the rock over 3.0 times per game.

The area where I think Holloway could excel though is on the defensive end as he’s an excellent on-ball and team defender, which would be something Woodson would likely be very interested in.

Overall, there’s a lot of individual things I like about Holloway’s game, but I have concerns as if he can put it all together and become a quality NBA point guard.

Long-term I see Holloway as a backup in the NBA, but he has the skills to be much more than that. If the Knicks look to draft a point guard, Holloway will certainly be someone they look at, but there are other point guard options I like much better.

To be more exact, the history of the No.48.

Fot Knicks fans hoping that general manager Glen Grunwald gets a key contributor to the 2013 team then luck necessarily won’t be on the Knicks side as the No. 48 pick has produced a who’s who list of draft busts throughout the past 20 years.

Let’s go back in time and look at who has been selected with the N0. 48 pick.

As you will see, the only guy to really make an NBA career for himself has been Marc Gasol who has become a very nice player for the Memphis Grizzlies. In addition, the only other player to have a successful NBA career that came from the No. 48 spot was Cedric Ceballos, who was drafted in 1990.

May 11, 2012; Los Angeles, CA, USA; Memphis Grizzlies center Marc Gasol (33) questions a call in the first half of game 6 of the Western Conference quarterfinals of the 2012 NBA Playoffs against the Los Angeles Clippers at the Staples Center. Mandatory Credit: Jayne Kamin-Oncea-US PRESSWIRE

2011- Atlanta Hawks, Keith Benson

2010: Miami Heat, Latavious Williams

2009: Phoenix Suns, Taylor Griffin

2008: Phoenix Suns, Malik Hairston

2007: Los Angeles Lakers, Marc Gasol

2006: Washington Wizards, Valdimir Veremeenko

2005: Seattle SuperSonics, Mickael Gelabale

2004: Sacramento Kings, Ricky Minard

2003: New Orleans Hornets, James Lang

2002: Memphis Grizzlies, Chris Owens

2001: Vancouver Grizzlies, Antonis Fotsis

2000: Philadelphia 76ers, Mark Karcher

1999: Milwaukee Bucks, Galen Young

1998: Cleveland Cavaliers, Ryan Stack

1997: Portland Trail Blazers, Alvin Williams

1996: Philadelphia 76ers, Jaime Feick

1995: Minnesota Timberwolves, Mark Davis

1994: Detroit Pistons, Jevon Crudup

1993: Portland Trail Blazers, Kevin Thompson

1992: Phoenix Suns, Brian Davis

1991: Utah Jazz, Isaac Austin

Is English's scoring touch what the Knicks need in the second round?

We’ve covered two point guards that could make an impact as a back-up for the Knicks as a second round draft pick. One with experience playing in MSG (Scoop Jardine) and one with New York ties and a mean ability to create opportunity (Scott Machado). Now, its time to look at one of the most prolific scoring points in this year’s draft crop, Missouri’s Kim English.

Missouri’s last impression is unfair considering all the good the team accomplished throughout the regular season. I mean, they were the Big 12 Champions, lest we forget. However, its the crushing loss to 15-seed Norfolk State in the first, er, second round of the NCAA Tournament that destroyed their hard work and a ton of brackets.

What Missouri did throughout the regular season was remarkable considering they played almost exclusively with a four-guard starting line-up. English, along with Marcus Denmon, Phil and Max Pressley created a dynamic starting line-up that few teams were able to keep up with in a fast-paced offensive attack. When you include sixth man Michael Dixon, the Tigers were an incredible team to watch on a nightly basis, which made them easy picks to do well in the NCAA Tournament.

On the season, English’s best attributes were on the offensive end. He averaged 14.5 points, with a remarkable 52.1% from the field and an even more impressive 45.9% from beyond the arc. His defense was better than average, bringing in over a steal a game, but English was never the main distributor on offense, averaging only 1.6 a night for a team that dished out over 16 a night.

While I admire everything English can do for a team on offense and love that he played against some of the best competition the game had to offer (including going head-to-head with potential lottery pick Tyshawn Taylor numerous times), I can’t bring myself to seeing him as a fit for the Knicks, especially if Machado is available before him.

The problem mainly for English is he’s really not a point guard, but more of a combo-guard in the form of Iman Shumpert. He would be a luxury for the Knicks if they took him instead of someone that would fill a hole. In the draft, the Knicks should focus on one of three aspects: a back-up point guard with the potential to one day start, a defensive-minded block player or a combo guard with an emphasis on defense.

English is no bum when it comes to one-on-one defending, but Missouri did play almost strictly a zone coverage because of their lack of size inside, forcing teams to move the ball around the wing in order to create scoring opportunities. His best asset (scoring at will) isn’t something the Knicks are really short of. English would likely play with the second unit if he played at all, and his opportunities would be limited especially if J.R. Smith re-ups with the team in the off-season.

You can talk me into English fitting on the Knicks if Smith walks, but that’s the only scenario I truly see him working into the Knicks master plan. Would I be upset if the Knicks went with English at 48th overall? Absolutely not. I think he did more than enough at Missouri to prove he can be a scorer and a contributor in the NBA.

However, that late in the draft, it isn’t about taking the best player, but taking the best option that fills a need. Right now, Kim English wouldn’t fill a need for the Knicks the way they are currently constructed.

Will Machado be available for the Knicks at #48?

Earlier, we took a closer look at a potential option for the Knicks at pick #48 with a rundown of Syracuse point guard Scoop Jardine. Jardine has a history playing big games in Madison Square Garden already with the Orange, so Knicks fans should be very familiar with his abilities and what he can do against elite competition.

One option that may have flown under the radar, at least on the national level, is the play of another New York collegiate point guard: Iona’s Scott Machado. According to NBADraft.net’s 2012 Mock Draft, Machado is slated to go 60th overall, or the final pick of the draft, to the Los Angeles Lakers.

We’ve already covered the options present for the Knicks depending on all the different situations involving Jeremy Lin and his Bird Rights. With or without having to use the Mid-Level Exception on Lin, the Knicks don’t have any reliable back-ups at the point, and the team might be best off using their lone 2012 draft pick on back-court depth.

A Queens native, Machado averaged a remarkable 9.9 assist-per-game as the leader of the surprising Iona Gaels squad that lost to BYU in the First Four. He also averaged 1.6 steals, 13.6 points on 49.5% shooting from the field, 40% from 3-pt land. Though Machado spent the majority of his season playing inferior competition in the MAAC, he had some of his best performances against out of conference foes, including a 14 point, 11 assist effort against Purdue on opening night.

More importantly, he was the maestro to the nation’s highest scoring offense. Everything Iona wanted to accomplish on the offensive end of the floor started with, and sometimes ended with, Machado. He would draw the focus of the defense to him, allowing him to dish it inside to players like Mike Glover or along the wings to Jemel Jenkins or Sean Armand. The Gaels also led the nation in assist-per-game, with more than 50% of that responsibility coming from whatever Machado gave them each night.

As far as pure point guards go, Machado is one of the best available. He has the experience you would want at a back-up point guard position, having spent four full seasons playing ball in New Rochelle. His game also emphasizes getting his teammates involved and playing strong defense, which would both flow perfectly into how the Knicks run their offense through their stars and set-up shooters.

For me, Machado would be a dream come true at 48th. Though some might think he’s too small (he’s listed at 6’1″, 180 pounds) to withstand a full NBA season, he’s exactly what a team like the Knicks would want as their back-up point guard. He’s a Rajon Rondo-lite with a more polished jump shot than Rondo had when he came out of Kentucky. Would I be concerned about him playing at a smaller school? No, mostly due to the rules forcing future players to spend at least a year in college creating more depth in the college game.

If you haven’t heard a lot about Machado at this point in the process, you will soon. He can be a starter in this league with the right coaching and game plan. Hopefully, those coincide with a second round draft selection from the New York Knicks.

Mar 22, 2012; Boston, MA, USA; Syracuse Orange guard Scoop Jardine (11) shoots over Wisconsin Badgers forward Ryan Evans (5) in the second half of the east region of the 2012 NCAA men

In addition to needing frontcourt depth, which I looked at by taking a look at Cincinnati’s Yancy Gates and Gonzaga’s Robert Sacre, the Knicks also need to address point guard depth in the offseason as well.

If things go well and the Knicks get the Bird right’s of Jeremy Lin, they will be in a position to potentially also add a veteran guard to back up Lin as well.

However if they don’t and are forced to use their MLE to keep Lin in the Big Apple, general manager Glen Grunwald could be forced to address point guard depth via June’s draft.

On the surface that could be a problem, considering they would have a guy in Lin that started only 25 games and a rookie as his backup. If that’s the route they have to go, there are some talented point guards to take a look at, one of which being Philadelphia native and former Syracuse product Scoop Jardine.

Jardine is likely viewed as an NBA backup after averaging 8.3 points and 4.7 assists for the Orange as a senior. But with the No. 48 pick, that is essentially what the Knicks are looking to add and that’s depth.

He’s a guy that sees the floor pretty well and is a pretty good decision maker, but he isn’t viewed as a great athlete and doesn’t have great end-to-end speed.

But Jardine is a crafty player who finds a way to make plays.

As a shooter, Jardine made 53 percent of his 2-point attempts and 38 percent of his attempts from behind the arc. I look at something like that more than his per game averages as Syracuse was a very deep team and on any other team Jardine likely would have put up better overall numbers.

The Knicks worked out Jardine, but I find it very interesting that he doesn’t even crack ESPN’s Chad Ford’s Top 100 prospects, which could lead me to believe that he could go undrafted and someone the Knicks could sign afterwards.

 Next in the Series: Tu Holloway, Xavier

Mar 22, 2012; Boston, MA, USA; Cincinnati Bearcats forward Yancy Gates (34) drives against Ohio State Buckeyes forward Jared Sullinger (0) in the second half of the semifinals in the east region of the 2012 NCAA men

One thing the New York Knicks need to address in 2012 draft is frontcourt depth.

With Jared Jeffries a free agent and Josh Harrleson and Jerome Jordan lacking the muscle to really contribute at the defensive end of the floor, adding quality backups for Amar’e Stoudemire and Tyson Chandler mus be an offseason priority.

After taking a look at Gonzaga’s Robert Sacre in the first part of our draft watch, today I take a look at Cincinnati’s Yancy Gates, a 6’9″ power forward  who could be around for the Knicks in the second round.

Gates is very strong and a solid athlete with a 7’3″ wingspan that should allow him to defend the 4 or the 5.

He averaged a career high 12.2 points per game and pulled down 8.9 rebounds as well. That’s the good news. The bad news is that Gates shot only 47.4 percent from the floor, the lowest percentage of his collegiate career and he’s also a miserable free-throw shooter, making only 58.8 percent throughout his college career.

There was also the brawl against Xavier which sticks out as a negative, but to his credit, Gates was a model citizen after that.

Gates is a guy that can contribute offensively with a soft touch around the rim and a decent mid-range game.

Defensively he could become a contributor similar to the role Jeffries filled.

Ironically it could be Jeffries who Gates may eventually replace if drafted by the Knicks.

Next in the series: Scoop Jardine, Syracuse

Anyone that follows the NBA closely knows that the word conspiracy and the name David Stern pretty much go hand in hand.

Through time we’ve seen the 1985 lottery and the case of the allegedly creased envelope that allowed the New York Knicks to win the draft rights to Patrick Ewing.

Who could forget Michael Jordan going to play baseball and the alleged gambling suspension?

Then there is the always occurring theme of shady refereeing. Tim Donaghy in 2002 during the Los Angeles Lakers-Sacramento Kings series, or even more recent, any 2012 playoff game involving the Miami Heat.

Which brings us to Wednesday night’s lottery. Could it have been rigged?

Adrian Wojnarowski of Yahoo! Sports has found that many executives around the league are upset that the NBA-owned New Orleans Hornets were able to beat the odds and win the draft lottery:

“It’s such a joke that the league made the new owners be at the lottery for the show,” one high-ranking team executive told Yahoo! Sports. “The league still owns the Hornets. Ask their front office if new owners can make a trade right now. They can’t. This is a joke.”

Stern maximized the value for the Hornets when they were up for sale by nixing the original Chris Paul trade with the Lakers, making the Clippers pay a steep price to land the All-Star point guard.

Then he negotiated a $338 million sale of the franchise to New Orleans Saints’ owner Tom Benson and the team had just a 13.7 percent chance of having their pick come up No. 1.  Could there have been a hand shake deal along with the sale of the franchise that the Hornets would have the No. 1 pick in the draft?

It’s really not that crazy of a theory.

Of course it’s something that could never be proven, but given the things that happen in the NBA under Stern’s watch, it wouldn’t surprise me one bit if that were the case.

Apr 2, 2012; New Orleans, LA, USA; Kentucky Wildcats forward Anthony Davis waves to the crowd after cutting down a piece of the net after the finals of the 2012 NCAA men

That was the case Wednesday night when the New Orleans Hornets stole the No. 1 overall pick away from the Charlotte bobcats and won the right to draft Kentucky freshman Anthony Davis.

The Hornets moved up from the fourth spot, where they had a 13.7 percent chance, to earn the pick.

You have to feel bad for Michael Jordan and the Bobcats as 2012 has been a season of one loss after another and this was no exception. The Bobcats fall to the No. 2 pick, but they no longer are in position to land the game-changer they need in Davis.

For the Hornets, they have a new owner in Tom Benson and things have started out good in the Benson era as they land a new superstar.

No other team moved up in the draft, but the Hornets weren’t the only winners as Portland and Golden State have the No. 6 and No. 7 picks respectively so each team gets to keep that pick instead of losing it to Brooklyn and Utah.

Complete Draft Order

1. New Orleans Hornets

2. Charlotte Bobcats

3. Washington Wizards

4. Cleveland Cavaliers

5. Sacramento Kings

6. Portland Trail Blazers (via Brooklyn Nets)

7. Golden State Warriors

8. Toronto Raptors

9. Detroit Pistons

10. New Orleans Hornets (via Minnesota Timberwolves)

11. Portland Trail Blazers

12. Milwaukee Bucks

13. Phoenix Suns

14. Houston Rockets

15. Philadelphia 76ers

16. Houston Rockets (via New York Knicks)

17. Dallas Mavericks

18. Minnesota Timberwolves (via Utah Jazz)

19. Orlando Magic

20. Denver Nuggets

21. Boston Celtics

22. Boston Celtics (via Los Angeles Clippers)

23. Atlanta Hawks

24. Cleveland Cavaliers (via Los Angeles Lakers)

25. Memphis Grizzlies

26. Indiana Pacers

27. Miami Heat

28. Oklahoma City Thunder

29. Chicago Bulls

30. Golden State Warriors (via San Antonio Spurs) 

Second Round

31. Charlotte Bobcats

32. Washington Wizards

33. Cleveland Cavaliers

34. Cleveland Cavaliers (via New Orleans Hornets)

35. Golden State Warriors (via Brooklyn Nets)

36. Sacramento Kings

37. Toronto Raptors

38. Denver Nuggets (via New York Knicks)

39. Detroit Pistons

40. Portland Trail Blazers (via Houston Rockets)

41. Portland Trail Blazers

42. Milwaukee Bucks

43. Atlanta Hawks (via Phoenix Suns)

44. Detroit Pistons (via Houston Rockets)

45. Philadelphia 76ers

46. Washington Wizards (via Dallas Mavericks)

47. Utah Jazz

48. New York Knicks

49. Orlando Magic

50. Denver Nuggets

51. Boston Celtics

52. Golden State Warriors (via New Jersey Nets)

53. Los Angeles Clippers

54. Philadelphia 76ers (via Memphis Grizzlies) 

55. Dallas Mavericks (via Los Angeles Lakers)

56. Toronto Raptors

57. New Jersey Nets (via Miami Heat)

58. Minnesota Timberwolves (via Oklahoma City Thunder)

59. San Antonio Spurs

60. Los Angeles Lakers (via Chicago Bulls) 

But what about the losers in the lottery?

What about the teams who never got lucky enough to see their fortunes change almost overnight?

Since 1985, when the draft lottery was first instituted, there have been as many big losers as there have been winners.

Here’s a quick look at the top 10 losers in NBA draft lottery history.

10. 2010 New Jersey Nets

Apr 26, 2012; Washington, DC, USA; Washington Wizards point guard John Wall (2) shoots a layup against the Miami Heat during the first half at the Verizon Center. Mandatory Credit: Brad Mills-US PRESSWIRE

The Nets had the best odds to win the lottery after finishing the regular season with a dismal 12-70 record, yet they had to settle for the No. 3 pick, as the Washington Wizards ended up stealing the No. 1 overall pick despite only having the fifth-best odds at doing so.

The prize turned out to be point guard John Wall. Had the Nets won that lottery, they likely don’t make a trade for Deron Williams, whom they risk losing to free agency this offseason.

9. 2009 Sacramento Kings/Washington Wizards

The Kings and Wizards were both in search of a quality power forward and had the two best odds at winning the right to draft Oklahoma’s Blake Griffin, but it turned out to be the Los Angeles Clippers who won that right, with the third-best odds to do so.

Had they not won the 2009 lottery, where would Chris Paul be playing at these days? I doubt it would be for the Clippers.

8. 2008 Miami Heat

The Heat finished the 2008 season with a 15-61 record and the best chances at claiming the top pick, but ultimately they got the second pick and drafted Michael Beasley, who didn’t last long in a Miami uniform.

The Chicago Bulls had only the ninth-best odds to win, and luck was on their side, as they were able to draft Derrick Rose.

This only ranks No. 8 because we all know how well the Heat ended up, but if they win that lottery, what are the chances that LeBron James takes his talents to South Beach?

7. 1991 Denver Nuggets

The Nuggets finished the 1991 season with an NBA-worst 20-62 record, but finished with the No. 4 pick as the Charlotte Hornets moved up from the No. 5 spot to select UNLV’s Larry Johnson.

Johnson turned in a solid 10-year career in which he averaged 16.2 points and 7.5 rebounds for Charlotte and the New York Knicks. It wasn’t a total loss for the Nuggets, though, as they did come out with Dikembe Mutombo with that No. 4 pick.

6. 1993 Dallas Mavericks

The Mavs were miserable in 1993, finishing with an 11-71 record but found themselves drafting No. 4, as the Orlando Magic made the biggest jump in lottery history, moving all the way to the top despite having the worst odds to do so.

The Magic ended up selecting Chris Webber, who was eventually traded for Penny Hardaway on draft night.

Dallas drafted Jamal Mashburn, who turned in a decent NBA career, but nothing like Webber orHardaway in their prime.

5. 1987 Los Angeles Clippers

This gets added to the long list of bad luck for the Clippers franchise, as they won only 12 games in 1987, but it was the San Antonio Spurs who climbed up to draft David Robinson.

The Clippers picked No. 4 that year and took Georgetown’s Reggie Williams.

4. 1996 Vancouver Grizzlies

May 23, 2012; Philadelphia, PA USA; Philadelphia 76ers former guard Allen Iverson before the start of game six against the Boston Celtics in the Eastern Conference semifinals of the 2012 NBA Playoffs at the Wells Fargo Center. Mandatory Credit: Eric Hartline-US PRESSWIRE

Long before moving to Memphis, the Grizzlies had the best chance of winning the right to draft Allen Iverson after a 15-67 season in 1996.

They weren’t that lucky, as they ended up with Shareef Abdur-Rahim at No. 3. The Philadelphia 76ers ended up drafting the future Hall of Famer.

3. 1992 Minnesota Timberwolves

How would the NBA world have been different if the Wolves would have won the 1992 lottery?

They had the best odds after finishing the season 15-67, but it was the Orlando Magic who won the right to select LSU’s Shaquille O’Neal.

Instead of Shaq, Minnesota had to settle for Christian Laettner at No. 3.

2. 1985 Indiana Pacers

The very first draft lottery featured a big prize in Georgetown’s Patrick Ewing, and while the Pacers finished with the worst record in the NBA that season, it was the New York Knicks who won the right to select Ewing.

The prize for Indiana at No. 2 turned out to be Oklahoma’s Wayman Tisdale.

1. 1997 Vancouver Grizzlies/Boston Celtics

The Grizzlies finished with an NBA-worst record of 14-68 in 1997, and the Celtics weren’t far behind at 15-67. In fact, Boston actually had two chances at winning the top pick, but things didn’t quite work out well for either franchise.

The San Antonio Spurs won that lottery and drafted Tim Duncan, who became the centerpiece for four championships.

Vancouver had to settle for Antonio Daniels at No. 4, while the Celtics ended up with Chauncey Billups at No. 3 and Ron Mercer at No. 6.

Mar 15, 2012; Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Gonzaga Bulldogs center Robert Sacre (0) drives against West Virginia Mountaineers forward Dominique Rutledge in the second round of the 2012 NCAA men

With the 2012 NBA draft about a month away, today I will begin a daily look at players the Knicks have worked out, looking at not only who the Knicks could select with the No. 48 pick, but also how that potential pick could fit into the New York lineup.

First off in the series is a look at Gonzaga center Robert Sacre.

Sacre is a guy I liked a lot in college. He’s a true seven-footer and could fill the need as a backup center to Tyson Chandler.

He’s not a great offensive player, but he’s functional, averaging 11.6 points and 6.3 rebounds per game in his final season at Gonzaga, while shooting 51 percent from the floor.

What he is though is a big body that can play on the defensive end of the floor and spell Chandler. We all saw how much a different team the Knicks were when Chandler wasn’t on the floor, so adding a capable backup for the 2013 season needs to be one of many priorities for general manager Glen Grunwald.

Sacre isn’t an explosive athlete, but he’s long and can rebound and block shots.

Offensively, he’s raw, but can score in the paint effectively.

Depending on which way the Knicks want to go with the No. 48 pick, Sacre could be available if they are searching for a big man.

Tomorrow’s Draft Preview: Yancy Gates, Cincinnati

Who knows, maybe Glen Grunwald can find a way to get back into the first round to improve the 2013 team. This draft is very deep and loaded with talent.

In my latest mock draft, I focus in on the guys that have the chance to move up draft boards with a good showing at the NBA’s pre-draft combine, scheduled to be held in Chicago the first week of June.

Let’s take a look at who will land where.

1. Charlotte Bobcats: Anthony Davis, Kentucky

Davis is a no-brainer at No. 1 no matter who wins the lottery and claims the No. 1 pick.

His shot-blocking skills and outstanding length can lead to Davis making a big impact in the NBA as a rookie.

2. Washington Wizards: Thomas Robinson, Kansas  

I’ve had Robinson bouncing between No. 2 and No. 5 pretty consistently, but a strong showing in Chicago could lock him in at No. 2.

His size may be an issue at only 6’9”, but Robinson is an outstanding athlete with a nonstop motor.

Robinson can play way above the rim but has also developed a complete offensive package as he can score with his back to the basket or facing the rim. He’s come a long way from a guy that was viewed as just a dunker.

He’s also a relentless rebounder who crashes the glass at both ends of the floor.

In terms of production, Robinson averaged 17.9 points and 11.9 rebounds per game and recorded 29 double-doubles on the season. There may be guys in the draft with more upside, but Robinson is NBA-ready right now.

3. Cleveland Cavaliers: Bradley Beal, Florida        

March 24, 2012; Phoenix, AZ, USA; Florida Gators guard Bradley Beal (23) shoots over Louisville Cardinals guard/forward Kyle Kuric (14) during the second half in the finals of the west region of the 2012 NCAA men

There are plenty of options here for Cavs as they could elect for size, but it’s hard to pass on an athlete like Beal here.

Cleveland needs some scoring punch, and Beal is a guy that not only averaged 14.8 points per game at Florida, but has outstanding range on his jumper. Paired with Kyrie Irving, Cleveland could have a scary good young backcourt for the future.

4. New Orleans Hornets: Michael Kidd-Gilchrist, Kentucky

The Hornets need a leader for the future and can’t go wrong with MKG here.

He’s an outstanding athlete who excels on the defensive end of the floor. Kidd-Gilchrist is a high character guy who the Hornets can build around.

5. Sacramento Kings: Andre Drummond, Connecticut

No team in the NBA allowed more points than the Kings, and adding a big man to pair with DeMarcus Cousins is a must.

Drummond may not be NBA-ready but has as much upside as anyone in this draft class. He’s got a good feel for the game and pulled down 7.7 boards while blocking 2.9 shots per game, so he should be able to help defensively right off the bat.

6. Portland Trail Blazers (via New Jersey Nets): Damian Lillard, Weber State      

Lillard is the top guard on the board right now and could solidify that with a strong showing in Chicago.

He’s a guy with very good size, speed and strength. While he showed the ability to be an explosive scorer, averaging 24.5 points per game, Lillard is also a good setup man, averaging nearly a two to one assist-to-turnover ratio.

Lillard only averaged four assists per game at Weber State, but he was asked to score a lot. The pre-draft combine gives him the opportunity to show NBA teams that he’s more than capable of running an NBA offense.

The Blazers need a point guard for the future, and it will be difficult to pass on Lillard here.

7. Golden State Warriors: Harrison Barnes, North Carolina    

When the lottery is all said and done, if Golden State gets to keep this pick (must be in top seven), then adding some production from the wing is a must.

Barnes is almost the perfect fit, as he has the talent to become a No. 1 scoring option in the NBA, coming off a season where he averaged 17.7 points per game at North Carolina.

8. Toronto Raptors: Austin Rivers, Duke   

The Raptors also need production from the wing, but passing on Rivers may be difficult to do.

He’s a guy I’ve had consistently towards the end of the lottery, but Rivers is the perfect example of a guy that can rise up draft boards with a good showing in Chicago.

Rivers averaged 15.5 points per game at Duke, which would help Toronto, but first he must show that he has a consistent jumper and can play without the ball.

He also must show he can use his teammates better and won’t rely on isolation so much.

If he shows that, with his talent and upside, I have no doubt that Rivers can sneak into the Top 10.

9. Detroit Pistons: Perry Jones III, Baylor

Jones has all the skills in the world. I often say he runs like a deer and can jump through the gym, which is true.

But he must show the ability to produce consistently like his skill set says he should.

He didn’t at Baylor, averaging only 13.5 points and 7.6 rebounds per game.

With a good combine his stock should soar once again, and Detroit won’t be able to pass on him here. A big man would be ideal, but the biggest goal for the Pistons is to get more athletic, and they will accomplish that with Jones, who can play either the three or the four.

10. New Orleans Hornets (via Minnesota Timberwolves): Kendall Marshall, North Carolina

Mar 18, 2012; Greensboro, NC, USA; North Carolina Tar Heels guard Kendall Marshall (5) dribbles in the second half. The Tar Heels defeated the Blue Jays 87-73 in the third round of the 2012 NCAA men

Adding Kidd-Gilchrist and Marshall in the Top 10 would be a huge win for the Hornets.

In Marshall they get their point guard for the future and the best pure floor general in the draft. The North Carolina product makes passing look effortless, averaging 9.8 assists on the season. He also is a top-notch decision maker, posting a 3.48 assist-to-turnover ratio.

11. Portland Trail Blazers: Tyler Zeller, North Carolina   

Zeller may never be an All-Star, but he will be productive. Zeller improved all four seasons at North Carolina and finished his career by averaging 16.4 points and 9.6 rebounds per game while shooting .555 from the floor.

The Blazers need a big man for the future and Zeller is a good center prospect with outstanding fundamentals.

12. Milwaukee Bucks: Jared Sullinger, Ohio State    

The Bucks need a big man who can be productive for years, and Sullinger is a very good fit here.

He averaged 17.3 points and 9.7 rebounds during his career at Ohio State and has a better post-game right now than anyone in the draft.

13. Phoenix Suns: Jeremy Lamb, Connecticut

Lamb has the skill set to become a top scoring option with time, and the Suns could use some backcourt production.

He led UConn in scoring at 17.7 points per game and has a very good first step. Lamb’s mid-range game can be a real weapon, but he also can extend his game behind the arc, shooting 34 percent from three-point range on the season.

14. Houston Rockets: Arnett Moultrie, Mississippi State   

Moultrie can force a team in the Top 10 to take him with a dominant performance in Chicago.

Even if not, he’s a very good fit for Houston at No. 14.

Moultrie has the size to play the four or the five but has the athletic ability of a guard. He’s an outstanding rebounder, pulling down 10.6 boards per game, but he’s also a fantastic scorer (16.4 PPG) from both the inside or outside, shooting 55 percent from the floor and 44 percent from behind the arc.

He’s almost too intriguing for a team not to take a gamble on.

15. Philadelphia 76ers: John Henson, North Carolina

Henson will help improve the Sixers interior defense and could turn into a steal this late.

He’s extremely athletic, and while his offensive game is a little raw Henson can make an immediate impact as a rebounder (10.1 PPG) and shot-blocker (2.9 BPG)

16. Houston Rockets (via New York Knicks): Terrence Ross, Washington

March 8, 2012; Los Angeles, CA, USA; Washington Huskies guard Terrence Ross (31) drives to the basket during the second half of the game against Oregon State Beavers during the quarter finals of the 2012 Pac 12 Tournament at the Staples Center. Oregon State won 86-84. Mandatory Credit: Jayne Kamin-Oncea-US PRESSWIRE

Ross could make a quick rise up the board if he has a good showing in the Windy City.

Right now he’s overshadowed by the likes of Beal, Rivers and Lamb, but Ross is a pure scorer (16.8 PPG) who can help an NBA team immediately.

He can score from the outside, shooting 37 percent from behind the arc, as easily as he can put the ball on the deck and get to the rim.

While he can become a volume scorer, Ross is also a good rebounding guard (6.5 RPG) and solid defender for his size (6’6”).

He has a ton of upside but is a safe pick to make as well. It wouldn’t surprise me if he climbs into the lottery.

17. Dallas Mavericks: Meyers Leonard, Illinois    

Dallas needs to get younger, more athletic and bigger.

Leonard solves all of that, and while he won’t be an instant star he can be productive. Leonard put up good numbers at Illinois this season, averaging 13.6 points, grabbing 8.2 boards, blocking 1.9 shots and shooting 58 percent from the floor.

He has the skills; it just may take some time to develop them fully.

18. Minnesota Timberwolves (via Utah Jazz): Terrence Jones, Kentucky 

The Wolves ideally would like a player such as Ross to fall to them as they could use a legitimate two-guard, but with him off the board it’s hard to pass on an athlete such as Jones.

He has lottery-type talent and can rebound and score in traffic and averaged 12.5 points and 7.2 rebounds last season.

Those numbers may have been even more impressive had Kentucky not been the unselfish team that it was.

He’s a guy that can score from everywhere, shooting 50 percent from the floor and even 33 percent from behind the arc. Jones is a talented player and would be a good fit on any roster.

19. Orlando Magic: Moe Harkless, St. Johns

The Magic is close to starting over and Harkless is a talent that should be rising up draft boards before June’s draft.

He’s got some developing to do, but Harkless is a guy with scoring potential who averaged 15.3 points per game as a freshman at St. Johns. He’s a very good slasher but needs to work on his perimeter shot, as he was only 20 percent from behind the arc last season.

Harkless is also a very talented defender and rebounder (8.6 RPG).

Orlando is going to be looking for a guy with a ton of upside, and they can’t really go wrong withHarkless this late.

20. Denver Nuggets: Dion Waiters, Syracuse   

Denver doesn’t need much in terms of immediate impact so adding a combo-guard such as Waiters makes sense in terms of depth.

He’s lightning quick and excels at getting into the paint. Waiters would fit in nicely in George Karl’s up-tempo offense.

21. Boston Celtics: Andrew Nicholson, St. Bonaventure  

Mar 11, 2012; Atlantic City, NJ, USA; St. Bonaventure Bonnies forward Andrew Nicholson (44) A10 tournament MVP and A10 Player of the Year celebrates victory over Xavier Musketeers in the finals of the 2012 Atlantic 10 Tournament at Boardwalk Hall. St. Bonaventure Bonnies defeat the Xavier Musketeers 67-56. Mandatory Credit: Jim O

Nicholson could become one of the steals of the draft and could cement himself as a first-round pick by taking care of business in Chicago.

Boston needs young big bodies for the future, and the St. Bonaventure product has a good bit of upside and could be a very good fit in Boston.

Nicholson did everything well in college, averaging 18.5 PPG, 8.5 RPG and 2.0 BPG. He also shot 57 percent from the floor and 43 percent from behind the arc during his senior season.

He has the chance to become a very productive NBA player.

22. Boston Celtics (via Los Angeles Clippers): Royce White, Iowa State    

This pre-draft camp is also important for a guy like White, who has the skills to become a very good NBA player, but there are some issues with an anxiety disorder which includes a fear of flying.

Yet if he has a good camp, teams will be forced to draft White simply based on his talents.

He’s 6’9” but has the playmaking skills and athleticism of a guard.

Even though he averaged 13.4 points and 9.4 rebounds per game, White also averaged 5.1 assists on the season, which not only led the Iowa State team, but also was fifth in the entire Big 12 Conference.

23. Atlanta Hawks: Doron Lamb, Kentucky   

Atlanta needs some additional scoring punch, and adding a guy with the talents of Lamb could go a long way to fixing that problem.

Lamb shot 47 percent from behind the arc and averaged 13.9 points per game for Kentucky. When he’s going well, Lamb can be a lethal scorer. He’s a near perfect fit for the Hawks.

24. Cleveland Cavaliers (via Los Angeles Lakers): Jeffrey Taylor, Vanderbilt

The Cavs get even more athletic with Taylor, a guy that has the ability to become a very good perimeter defender.

He also has a nice offensive package. Taylor averaged 16.1 points per game, but is even more of a prospect now that he developed a perimeter shot, shooting 42 percent from behind the arc on the season.

25. Memphis Grizzlies: Tony Wroten, Washington   

Mar 27, 2012; New York, NY, USA; Washington Huskies guard Tony Wroten (14) drives the lane during the first half half of the semifinal round against the Minnesota Golden Gophers at the NIT held at Madison Square Garden. Mandatory Credit: Anthony Gruppuso-US PRESSWIRE

Wroten is very talented but needs time to develop.

Memphis has the luxury of being able to take its time with him.

He’s lightning quick and has an exceptional change of direction. Wroten could be a good scorer right now, after averaging 16.0 points per game, but he has some holes in his game.

He has no perimeter shot right now, shooting only 16 percent from behind the arc. He also tends to force things trying to make the spectacular play instead of simply taking what the defense gives him.

Turnovers are also a problem, as he averaged 3.8 miscues per game as a freshman, compared to only 3.7 assists.

Wroten’s ceiling is very high, and he can use Chicago’s camp to show NBA teams that he has the ability to improve in those areas of his game.

26. Indiana Pacers: Marquis Teague, Kentucky   

Indiana can nab its point guard for the future with Teague, who is similar to Wroten in that he has a ton of upside.

Teague has good size and excellent athleticism for the point guard position to go along with blazing speed and the ability to play in any style of offense.

He averaged 13.4 points, 4.9 assists and 3.0 rebounds throughout March, cutting his turnovers down to 2.5 per game in the process, which was a problem for him for most of the regular season.

27. Miami Heat: Festus Ezeli, Vanderbilt

Ezeli averaged 10.0 PPG, 2.0 BPG and shot 60 percent from the floor for Vanderbilt this season. He could turn into the productive post presence that Miami needs.

He may have to be brought along slowly, but he’s very talented and could become a decent NBA center.

28. Oklahoma City Thunder: Quincy Miller, Baylor  

Miller has a ton of skill and despite maybe not being NBA-ready just yet, he’s a prospect that has first round talent.

He’s a scorer and while he was a bit inconsistent coming off a torn ACL his senior season in high school, Miller’s upside is very high.

The Thunder doesn’t need much right now except depth, so it can afford to gamble on Miller and reap the benefits later on.

29. Chicago Bulls: John Jenkins, Vanderbilt

Chicago needs scoring options to go alongside Derrick Rose, and adding a guy like Jenkins makes sense for down the road. He’s the best pure shooter in the college game and has a very quick release to go along with unlimited range, shooting 44 percent from behind the arc on the season.

You can never have too much shooting and down the road; he could turn into the replacement for Richard Hamilton.

30. Golden State Warriors (via San Antonio Spurs): Fab Melo, Syracuse    

Melo is raw offensively, but the talent is there as Melo has a pretty soft touch around the rim, shooting 57 percent on the season.

Needing a big guy for so long, the Warriors can take a gamble on Melo’s upside. At the minimum, he should be able to help Golden State on the defensive end this season, blocking 2.9 shots per game last season for Syracuse.

With no first-round pick and the Knicks not drafting until No. 48 overall, selecting the right guy becomes very important for general manager Glen Grunwald. Bringing in a rookie that can contribute a little can go a long way to not only improving depth on the club for next season, but also will help the Knicks stay younger for the future.

Grunwald drafted Josh Harrleson in the second round a year ago and with this being a very deep draft, he may have even more luck with this pick.

Here’s a look at a few guys the Knicks should target with their second-round pick come June 30.

Herb Pope, Seton Hall

Mar 13, 2012; South Orange, NJ, USA; Seton Hall Pirates player Herb Pope (15) celebrates making a play in the second half against the Stony Brook Seawolves in the first round of the NIT at Walsh Gymnasium. Mandatory Credit: Tim Farrell/THE STAR-LEDGER via US PRESSWIRE

Adding a power forward with Pope’s skill set would be a steal this late in the draft. He’s a scorer and a relentless rebounder, averaging 15.2 points and 10.3 assists per game during his senior season at Seton Hall.

He’s very athletic and is a guy that could be developed for the future. Pope has first round type talent and it’s likely doubtful he slips that far down in the second round, but stranger things have happened.

Alex Young, IUPUI

Young is a scorer, averaging 20.4 PPG during his senior season. Depending on what happens to the Knicks depth at the 2-guard spot this offseason, they may be forced to address that need through the draft.

He can fill it up, but I worry about Young’s perimeter shot being a little bit inconsistent. He shot 40 percent from behind the arc as a sophomore, but that number dipped all the way down to 34 percent as a senior.

JaMychael Green, Alabama

Green is a solid power forward who averaged 14.0 points and 7.4 rebounds per game as a senior. He’s 6’9″ and can give the Knicks a lift on the defensive end of the floor, blocking 1.5 shots per game.

He has a lot of upside due to his length, explosiveness and aggressiveness and while he may need to add some muscle, Green could be a project worth taking a shot on.

Mike Scott, Virginia

Scott really opened up some eyes towards the end of the season and finished his senior year averaging 18.1 points and 8.3 rebounds per game.

He was at Virginia for five seasons and improved as a player every single one of then. Scott is 6’8″, 230 pounds and is a strong, physical, low-post player with a non-stop motor. Scott will turn 24 this year and is undersized, but other than those drawbacks, he’s a competitor who has score and rebound.

Robert Sacre, Gonzaga

Mar 15, 2012; Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Gonzaga Bulldogs center Robert Sacre (0) drives against West Virginia Mountaineers forward Dominique Rutledge in the second round of the 2012 NCAA men

Sacre makes a lot of sense as the Knicks need frontcourt depth and he can slide in as the backup to Tyson Chandler.

He averaged 11.3 points and 7.6 rebounds per game at Gonzaga, but he’s a guy who’s very long and can block shots and rebounds, which is important as we saw how much different the Knicks defense was when Chandler wasn’t on the floor.

Sacre also has a soft touch around the rim, shooting 51 percent from the floor. He’s a all-around good player that could provide good value in the second round.

Kevin Murphy, Tennessee Tech

If the Knicks are looking for scoring, they can’t go wrong with a guy like Murphy.

Murphy can play the 2 or the 3 and is one of the better pure scorers in this draft class, averaging 20.6 PPG on the season, including a 50-point game. He’s a great shooter with range and also has an outstanding first step.

Murphy’s a fluid athlete with excellent length. He’s a very fun player to watch.

Kim English, Missouri

Fans didn’t get to see enough of English in the NCAA Tournament as Missouri was upset in the first round, but the guy is a shooter. He has a quick release an unlimited range, averaging 14.5 points and shooting 46 percent from behind the arc, but that’s really all he does well.

English is almost a Steve Novak-type of player. His ability to shoot the ball will keep him in the NBA, but he’s not a guy that can create his own shot, nor is he a great athlete, but the guy can shoot the ball.

Henry Sims, Georgetown

I’m a fan of the Knicks going with frontcourt depth in this draft and Sims is another possibility.

Sims stands 6’10″, weighs 242 pounds and is a very good athlete.  He’s very good 15-feet in, shooting 46 percent from the floor. Sims has good hands and is very athletic, but he isn’t very physical and isn’t a great rebounder, pulling down only 6.0 rebounds per game on the season.