The New York Knicks have been notorious over the course of the past decade-plus for handing out bad contract after bad contract. Some of that explains the horrible financial situation that the Knicks are often in as it pertains to the salary cap.
Yet on the same day that the Knicks upgraded on the wing by signing former Los Angeles Lakers forward Metta World Peace to a two-year deal, the team announced hours later that reigning Sixth Man of the Year J.R. Smith would miss the next 12-16 weeks following knee surgery.
That alone begs the question of whether or not the Knicks made yet another mistake by officially inking Smith to a four-year deal just days prior?
While the surgery alone to repair his patella tendon and an arthroscopy for a tear in the lateral meniscus of his left knee isn’t considered major, the Knicks statement regarding the surgery is baffling.
According to the Knicks official Twitter feed, the team knew about Smith’s injuries prior to re-signing him and called his injuries chronic and gradually worsened.
J.R. Smith’s injuries were chronic and gradually worsened. Recovery time is approximately 12-16 weeks.
— NY_KnicksPR (@NY_KnicksPR) July 15, 2013
Yet they give him a four-year deal?
That’s the definition of damaged goods.
I’m not suggesting that the team shouldn’t have signed Smith, but to give him a four-year deal is a bit ludicrous, especially when the team knew he had knee problems.
They had all the leverage in this situation and failed to use it.
You can make the case that the Smith contract was a bad one before the surgery, but now you really have to question the Knicks thinking here.
While Smith does bring some scoring off the bench and is coming off a career year last season, averaging 18.1 points, 5.3 rebounds, 2.7 assists and 1.3 steals in 33.5 minutes per contest off the bench., there is also a lot to illustrate that Smith isn’t worth of a long-term deal.
First you have to ask if the Knicks can truly win with Smith playing in Mike Woodson’s system.
As my colleague Frank Diglio illustrated last week, that even while Smith’s numbers looked good, he was far from efficient, posting only his fifth best career season when looking at his Per 36 minute averages.
In addition, the Knicks offense put up 112.0 points per 48 minutes and 112.7 per 48 minutes when he was on the bench, which leads you to question how valuable he truly is to this Knicks team.
Then there is his career playoff performance, which leads you to believe that this wasn’t the smartest move from the Knicks.
For his career Smith shoots 39 percent from the field and 31 percent from three. His WS/48 (win shares per 48 minutes) get cut in half from .096 to .043 in the playoffs and his PER is that of a below average NBA player (13.2, average is 15).
When the playoffs begin, too much isolation isn’t a good thing. That’s Smith’s game and we saw this past postseason once again that it wasn’t effective.
I’m not hating on Smith getting a new contract. With the season he put up, he was going to get money from someone. But he has a lot to prove despite winning the Sixth Man of the Year Award last season. Can anyone honestly say that three years from now that his antics both on and off the floor won’t have worn thin and he won’t be considered a realistic part of the future?
You have to be convinced that the Knicks can win with a guy like Smith and so far the answer is they can’t. I hope Smith comes out and proves that the opposite is true, but it still doesn’t excuse the organization from handing out another bad contract.
The problem here is the Knicks foolishly handing out a four-year deal to a guy who they knew would be heading for knee surgery, which could prevent him from being ready for the beginning of the season.
That’s just not smart.
Well run organizations don’t make moves like that.
Hopefully this won’t turn out to be another deal that comes back to bite the Knicks in the behind like so many others have in the past.
Follow Matt Shetler on Twitter for news, reaction and analysis from around the NBA.